|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I orginally posted this in the "a little bitter" thread.
How about: (8)The top 8 seeds from each regional qualify + (4) All finalists & winners of each regional (6 teams - 2 top seeds) + (1) Chairmans award winners + (1) Higest Rookie Seed (possible top 8) + (2) Rookie of the year 2 (possible top 8) x 17 regionals =_________________________________________________ _ total 272 This is close to the number & it eliminates human error. This puts a little less focus on winning & a little more on doing well. If you feel like it throw in the other judged awards because there will be some overlap from regional to regional, & some overlap in award winners. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dilemma - Letter of the rules v. spirit of the rules | Natchez | General Forum | 27 | 03-04-2003 15:37 |
| Timing of nats for next year | Ian W. | Championship Event | 13 | 03-03-2003 18:28 |
| Time for new rules! | archiver | 2001 | 11 | 24-06-2002 02:01 |
| Qualifying for nats at a regional | patrickrd | General Forum | 1 | 31-03-2002 10:42 |
| What's the best qualifying rounds strategy? | Ken Leung | General Forum | 24 | 24-03-2002 18:25 |