|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
At a recent regional, my students noticed a robot using a material that we had wanted to use but could not find a "legal" way of using it. The material was not available at SPI and was neither in the kit nor on the AHL. The robot was able to use this material quite well and my students wanted to know why we don't do the same thing. My problem is what to do/ tell them? We will not use illegal parts even if we can "get away with it" but what about the team that is using it? What about the inspectors who missed this part at two seperate regionals even though it is a very obvious part? Any advice would be appreciated.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| News Flash: Sandpaper for traction is illegal | D.J. Fluck | General Forum | 8 | 21-01-2003 11:45 |
| the provided chassis material | Andrew Dahl | Kit & Additional Hardware | 5 | 09-01-2003 15:26 |
| Box unbendable material | jrobo | Technical Discussion | 5 | 07-01-2003 16:12 |
| Beatty and Kingman | JAlpert | Regional Competitions | 51 | 08-04-2002 16:59 |
| Best material for wheels. | Dr.Bot | Technical Discussion | 0 | 21-01-2002 23:32 |