More then 2 team alliance???

[dlavery]

Originally Posted by Andy Baker

Dave,

I have been doing some detective work over the past few nights. Your hints have not been ignored. You are leaving quite a trail. Here is the evidence from your latest posts.

(Dave's posts are in " ", with my analysis following)

-----------

DL: "four elements: earth, wind, fire, and water... fifth element named 'Pete Best'"

Analysis: Pete Best is the 5th Beetle, as he was the drummer who Ringo replaced. Ringo is spelled with 5 letters.


< - blah, blah, blah, blah, blah - >

Analysis: 8"5" Mustang... "5".0.... "5"-speed.... 3"5"1 Cleveland.... KR"5"00. And... get this... the next Mustang he will buy will be his FIFTH! Wow!


DL: "Remind me that from now on I need to keep my mouth shut. -dave"

Dave, or should we call you "Mr. 5", you have already said too much.

Andy B.

Andy,

If I have told you once, I have told you five times, don't explain all the hints! We dont want everyone will figure it out too soon!

-dave, dave, dave, dave, and dave

[Rich Kressly]

NASA and Delphi are obviously is good hands these days

Baker, wanna come teach my Lit classes analysis and interpretation?

[Adam Y.]

I have been doing some detective work over the past few nights. Your hints have not been ignored. You are leaving quite a trail. Here is the evidence from your latest posts.

Wow that is extremely odd. Dave loves the number five.

[Matt Attallah]

And Team #5 is going to be sponsored by FORD this year...

Hm...

[Wayne C.]

If this is the year of 5 does that mean my guys are just squares ?

WC

[suneel112]

To go off topic...or ON topic, should I say, there should be a 2001 style game. Less bashing and stuff, where all the teams work together to accomplish a goal. If four is too much, 3 on a field at one time (like at Ford Sweet Repeat, 2001, if I am correct) is a good idea. 2 min/match is also a good idea. Maybe 2 1/2 min? Maybe Human Players vs Bots?

[Sidney San Martín]

You may think that team #5 will do well... But watch out for Team 555.
I sincerely hope that this is the year of the five: the year we finally win the comp/Chairman's Award.

[Elgin Clock]

Rumor Mill..


Ya know.. just sayin.

[JakeGallagher]

Originally Posted by Billfred

One problem. According to this page, Queer Eye premiered on July 15, 2003. According to this page (why doesn't Wikipedia have any mention of WNTW?), What Not to Wear first hit the (American) airwaves March 8, 2003. So What Not to Wear came first.

And before you try to get your conspiracy theories going, that's a FOUR-month gap.

When a network plans a show, don't they film it a few months in advance before they actually play it? I know WNTW still came before QE, but I think that the producers would have been *at least* thinking about the show a little earlier than March 8th, 2003.

Originally Posted by Andy Baker

-----

DL: "... and for you self-immolation fans, there was always the Pinto."

Analysis: "Pinto" has 5 letters in it. aaaaaah!
-----

Andy, isn't Pinto a little like the root Pente, meaning five?

Dave, Dave, Dave, Dave, Dave.....you are one enigmatic person.

[Elgin Clock]

5 eh?

Hmm.. You know, in 2001 we had 4 robots and an optional stretcher.

(Oh Please not the return of 4 against 0!!!! ) Can't we learn from our mistakes?

[Katie Reynolds]

Originally Posted by Elgin Clock

(Oh Please not the return of 4 against 0!!!! ) Can't we learn from our mistakes?

No, no, no, no, no, Elgin ... it would have to be 4 against 1. ... 4+0=4 ... 4+1=5

Which would be worse - 4v0 or 4v1? ... Yiiiiikes!

[JakeGallagher]

Originally Posted by Katie Reynolds

No, no, no, no, no, Elgin ... it would have to be 4 against 1. ... 4+0=4 ... 4+1=5

Which would be worse - 4v0 or 4v1? ... Yiiiiikes!

Maybe some King of the Hill action?

[Sidney San Martín]

Originally Posted by JakeGallagher

Maybe some King of the Hill action?

KOTH... not in a virtual world.... with FIRST robots.... [drool]

[JakeGallagher]

Originally Posted by Sidney San Martín

KOTH... not in a virtual world.... with FIRST robots.... [drool]

Hey hey hey. Don't get too drooly yet. It's still about...well...three months out. Would FIRST change their minds about the game in whatever ways they could in that amount of time, Dave? I mean sometimes I think they're out just to make our FIRST fantasies harder to live out...

[Wetzel]

Originally Posted by Katie Reynolds

No, no, no, no, no, Elgin ... it would have to be 4 against 1. ... 4+0=4 ... 4+1=5

Which would be worse - 4v0 or 4v1? ... Yiiiiikes!

4v71or45or111or222or254or60?

Sounds like fair odds to me.

Wetzel