More then 2 team alliance???

[JakeGallagher]

Originally Posted by Katie Reynolds

No, no, no, no, no, Elgin ... it would have to be 4 against 1. ... 4+0=4 ... 4+1=5

Which would be worse - 4v0 or 4v1? ... Yiiiiikes!

Maybe some King of the Hill action?

[Sidney San Martín]

Originally Posted by JakeGallagher

Maybe some King of the Hill action?

KOTH... not in a virtual world.... with FIRST robots.... [drool]

[JakeGallagher]

Originally Posted by Sidney San Martín

KOTH... not in a virtual world.... with FIRST robots.... [drool]

Hey hey hey. Don't get too drooly yet. It's still about...well...three months out. Would FIRST change their minds about the game in whatever ways they could in that amount of time, Dave? I mean sometimes I think they're out just to make our FIRST fantasies harder to live out...

[Wetzel]

Originally Posted by Katie Reynolds

No, no, no, no, no, Elgin ... it would have to be 4 against 1. ... 4+0=4 ... 4+1=5

Which would be worse - 4v0 or 4v1? ... Yiiiiikes!

4v71or45or111or222or254or60?

Sounds like fair odds to me.

Wetzel

[Billfred]

Perhaps I'm talking that crazy-talk here, but I think it would be interesting for some sort of 4v1 match. You'd just have to be very careful to make the game balanced. (besides, you know you'd root for the 1 over the four more often than not.)

[JVN]

Originally Posted by Andy Baker

Dave,

I have been doing some detective work over the past few nights. Your hints have not been ignored. You are leaving quite a trail. Here is the evidence from your latest posts.

Andy B.

Wait a second!
You're from team forty-FIVE!
You're in on it!

Andy, buddy, how could you?!?!

Holy moly...
229
2+2 = 4
9-4 = 5
5 = FIVE!

Ohh man. Just how deep does this conspiracy go?
I'm not sure if I can sleep at night.

*shifty eyes*
John