Opinion Website Rules?

[Max Lobovsky]

Your welcome. Sure, keep it. Since you already have it written, no sense in getting rid of it.

Originally Posted by Raven_Writer

1. So, basically, all I got to do is state factual opinions (or ways to justify my opinions)?

Interestingly enough, a supreme court ruling set a precedent by requiring libel to not just be fictitious, but intentionally fictitious (or so Wikipedia tells us). It might be hard for Dan Rather to pretend that he, or his sources were not intentionally fictitious, but for a small website run by Joe Shmoe (in the eyes of the law) with no real reputation or expected quality, I'm sure it's very easy to argue that any fictitious statement was not intended.