Go to Post Einstein 2015 was just a tryout for FIRST's next warehouse forklift operator. - Jay O'Donnell [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-10-2004, 20:51
Hinkel Y.'s Avatar
Hinkel Y. Hinkel Y. is offline
Registered User
FRC #0188 (Woburn Robotics)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 100
Hinkel Y. has a spectacular aura aboutHinkel Y. has a spectacular aura aboutHinkel Y. has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Hinkel Y.
Re: chains

The chains for Blizzard V never broke, but the same can't be said about the gearbox...
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-10-2004, 21:59
coreyjon's Avatar
coreyjon coreyjon is offline
Flight Engineer
FRC #0250 (Team 250 Dynamos)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Upstate, Ny
Posts: 184
coreyjon is just really nicecoreyjon is just really nicecoreyjon is just really nicecoreyjon is just really nicecoreyjon is just really nice
Send a message via AIM to coreyjon
Re: chains

I think we would all rather have a chain break then the gear box, although if everything is designed right, a key should break first before too much damage is caused to any key hard to replace component, or at least you would hope. I like to build everything strong enough, and robust enough to not worry, but the drill motor gear boxes where my weak link last season, but we powered along, and did a lot of pushing just with he cims, sometimes I would swear the drills had to be helping out the cims, but then I'd get it back in the pits, and sure enough, we would have wrecked another set of drill gb's. (plastic lock rings)
__________________
"Jack of all trades, master of none, though offtimes better than master of one".

Last edited by coreyjon : 06-10-2004 at 22:41.
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-10-2004, 11:13
sburro's Avatar
sburro sburro is offline
Registered User
AKA: Joe
FRC #0663 (crusaders)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: LOWELL
Posts: 129
sburro will become famous soon enoughsburro will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to sburro
Re: chains

ok, I would like to thank all for the replies. Now, I read the thread that Steve W suggested and was wondering if anything came out of the tread design that Adam Y. was designing.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-10-2004, 11:37
Unsung FIRST Hero
JVN JVN is offline
@JohnVNeun
AKA: John Vielkind-Neun
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Greenville, Tx
Posts: 3,159
JVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond repute
Re: chains

Quote:
Originally Posted by sburro
ok, I would like to thank all for the replies. Now, I read the thread that Steve W suggested and was wondering if anything came out of the tread design that Adam Y. was designing.
I think in that thread, Adam was talking about an attachment chain style tank drive. Though I'm not sure about his particular results, I KNOW FIRST has seen this design many times in the past...

The Technokats - Team 45 made attachment chain treads famous.
(Some refer to them as "Techno-tracks")
Refer to their 1999, 2001, 2002 robot designs.

Many other teams have used similar systems as well.
Wildstang 2002 used a chain tread in their drop down tank.
(Why choose between a swerve and a tank drive? Just do both! Crazy!)

These "mean metal treads" aren't seen in FIRST anymore due to limitations on metal interacting with the playingfield. Some teams have modified their chain treads with non-metal cleats. (I believe the pictures I link to, are from team 885's 2003 robot.)

Many teams now prefer timing belt style treads.

I believe (from what I've heard from 45) when using a chain drive, difficulty often arises in keeping the chains from throwing off their driving sprockets. Side loads during turning will cause the chains to walk off their sprockets despite tensioning. When one uses timing belts, this problem still arises, but can be overcome by using timing belts with some form of built in, central allignment.

The merits of using a track drive, and of using various drivetrain types has been WELL discussed. Feel free to search previous discussions of these topics for more information.

It all boils down to simple physics!

Hope this helps,
John
__________________
In the interest of full disclosure: I work for VEX Robotics a subsidiary of Innovation First International (IFI) Crown Supplier & Proud Supporter of FIRST

Last edited by JVN : 07-10-2004 at 11:43.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chain Drive Question Matt_Kaplan1902 Technical Discussion 34 12-04-2004 14:21
"Automatic Transmission" Madison Technical Discussion 70 24-11-2003 09:03
967 visualization tinsLee123 3D Animation and Competition 9 12-05-2003 15:22
chains in 3ds tinsLee123 3D Animation and Competition 4 17-02-2003 00:14
chains enjoiwheels Inventor 0 08-02-2003 19:33


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi