|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Small Regionals
Regionals do have spots reserved for rookies (and I believe for local teams as well, it would be horrible to register and find out the closest availible regional was 500 miles away) but small regionals are fun in two ways:
1) They allow you to be more active with your robot- more matches = more practice 2) less teams there = less data to memorize for scouting = more free brain space Also, with less teams being there in the first place, the pits feel a lot less hectic when theres only 30 gone-wild FIRST teams instead of 60. _Alex |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Small Regionals
Quote:
More matches is right. When we had 27 teams or however many there were at Sacramento in 2003, we had somewhere around 13 or 14 qualifying matches along with 3 six minute practice matches, which was basically 2 regionals worth of experience. It was insane though. You'd finish one match and be called to que up for your next one almost immediately. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Small Regionals
Quote:
_Alex |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Small Regionals
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Small Regionals
Speaking of small regionals, the Waterloo regional seems to be in need of a few teams. I believe that the minimum for a regional would be 24 teams. Right now they are a little short. I know the team putting together this regional and what a great job they are doing. If there are some teams looking for a third regional Waterloo is the place to be. It won't be a cakewalk to win though. It seems that it's a who's who of Canadian teams and Team 1188 from the US. Let's make this regional go.
I'll be there, hope to see you there too. ![]() Last edited by Steve W : 11-11-2004 at 11:29. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Small Regionals
I'm not sure how big the Buckeye regional is but i'd imagine that its a bit bigger because its a Nasa Sponsored one. With experiments that work!
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Small Regionals
I've always been a big fan of small regionals. When you spend 6 weeks building a robot, it's nice to get as many matches in as possible. Along with this benefit, these small regionals have a real community feel. You get to know all the teams and volunteers pretty well. We went to Pittsburgh last season (34-36 Teams), and we had an amazing time.
For those teams still considering doing another event, give small events like Arizona and Waterloo a look. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Small Regionals
If memory serves me correct, it seems like regionals are smaller this year than in previous years, even during the registration process. I think I remember FIRST officials stating at the Team forum this past summer, that they prefer the regionals to be 30-40 teams.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Small Regionals
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Small Regionals
Not sure this fits here but...
Consider the Toronto Regional. When registration started, it showed 72 available spaces. I looked a day or two ago and it showed as filled , but with only 60 registered teams. Hmmm? As the thread here has said, does that mean 12 spaces are being held for rookies? Also as a super regional, Toronto operates two fields, so in effect it is two 36 team regionals in one. Lots of matches for everybody. And when it comes to eliminations, instead of only 8 three team alliances, they pick 16 three team alliances. Last edited by Tuba4 : 10-11-2004 at 01:15. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| POLL: have small balls been abandoned? | Solace | General Forum | 44 | 04-09-2004 17:53 |
| Rookie Regionals | rachakate | Regional Competitions | 5 | 24-03-2004 00:01 |
| Hey FIRST - We're going to need a lot more regionals! | Raul | Regional Competitions | 41 | 08-11-2003 18:10 |
| Chief Delphi went to three regionals? | FIRSTfan | General Forum | 12 | 08-04-2002 11:07 |
| VCU and KSC regionals | Manoel | Regional Competitions | 0 | 25-09-2001 13:44 |