|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: A Centralized Code Dump?
I'm skeptical of the usefulness of wiki for this, since you'd be reduced to cutting and pasting code from the articles. Not to mention it'd be more difficult to group a build of code together with all its include files, etc. Sourceforge or some other system designed with code in mind would still probably be more useful.
I'm with Dave, though. A FIRST sponsored and organized site would probably work better and have a higher profile. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: A Centralized Code Dump?
It's pretty easy to group files together. You can organize pages by adding them to categories that generate automatic listings of all elements in the categories (and can have subcategories) and you can mimic a file structure by just making the name of the page the name of the file ("/Kevin's Code/sensor stuff/sensor.c").
I know its not ideal, but its up and running now, and stuff can always be moved to a more useful storage later. My main concern with some custom software is that it will fall into disrepair if it is something that only the FIRST community is using and that it will be too difficult to migrate to a different software (witness the old NRG repository). If MediaWiki software isn't the best, at least try to use some established piece of software so we can be assured of its longevity. Last edited by Max Lobovsky : 15-12-2004 at 12:15. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: A Centralized Code Dump?
SoundForge is better suited for this purpose as it is designed for such things. Wiki is good for overall data storage. Maybe we could use it as backup. As Dave said, lets wait till Jan.8 and see what happens. Or we could form something like FIRST Scouting Network and work our way from there. But I know that we definitely need some kind of place to store useful code and such.
-Bharat |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: A Centralized Code Dump?
The way SilverStar set up the SourceForge repository, it definitley is not an ideal solution. All submitions had to be posted in a sort of comment and reviewed by him. There was no easy CVS access (well, CVS would probably be too difficult for this, too. The majority of teams are not familiar with it).
The best dedicated solution that I know of is GraalForge, but again, I think that it is kind over complicated considering that the majority of code pieces being submitted will be in the <50 line range. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A Centralized Code Dump?
Well, i was going to make a code dump for my teams website anyway. So if FIRST does release one I can use this for my teams site. I like making things from scratch (I just have urges to re-invent the wheel). I have pretty much everything already made, such as a user system and a file system, so with some merging its really not to much of a drudgery task to create one from scratch for me. So, we'll see what happens.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: A Centralized Code Dump?
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A Centralized Code Dump?
That sounds like a great idea (the original code dump idea)
It would make things easier for up and coming programmers such as myself to find things and learn them |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What is your most prefered programming language? | Hailfire | Programming | 156 | 19-01-2005 21:42 |
| Sourceforge for Code Repository and other stuff | SilverStar | Programming | 9 | 15-01-2005 21:16 |
| heres the code. y this not working | omega | Programming | 16 | 31-03-2004 15:18 |
| Inserting Naviagation code into Default code? | actorindp | Programming | 3 | 28-01-2004 18:12 |
| Does your team use the Default code. | Jeff McCune | General Forum | 2 | 09-01-2003 14:46 |