|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
The way that it looks to me is that the "random picking" wasn't random at all. They put they teams in numerical order and took the first ten and put them in one division and next ten in the next division and so forth until they ran our of teams. So the reason that the best teams from each sponsor are in the same division is because a few years back they put the teams in alphabetical order by sponsor and numbered them that way. So when they put 65-71 in the same division they put four of the original five GM teams together. Not very random.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New predictions | gsensel | Championship Event | 6 | 12-04-2003 18:04 |
| Stack Height Scoring Analysis | Kevin Watson | Rules/Strategy | 4 | 07-01-2003 16:10 |
| MacWorld Expo Predictions | MattK | Chit-Chat | 8 | 07-01-2003 14:35 |
| Pre-competition predictions | archiver | 2001 | 3 | 24-06-2002 02:52 |
| Analysis of pictures | archiver | 2000 | 35 | 23-06-2002 21:57 |