Go to Post Transparency is the sign of BAD LARD! - ExcuseBoy [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Motors
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2004, 14:56
Wetzel's Avatar
Wetzel Wetzel is offline
DC Robotics
FRC #2914 (Tiger Pride)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: DC
Posts: 3,522
Wetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Wetzel
Shifting Efficiently

How do you calculate where the most efficient shift point is? I guess you could apply this to the robots, but my question is actually for automotive transmissions. I can drive a stick shift fine, and have for a few years, but I've had no instruction other then a friend talking me through it and giving me about an hour total of 'shift about now'.

I'm not even sure what you need to be able to go about figuring this out, but with gas prices what they are, any gained efficiency is more money in my pocket.


Wetzel
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2004, 15:11
greencactus3 greencactus3 is offline
occra 23.
AKA: ryo
None #1481
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: North Farmington, MI
Posts: 1,523
greencactus3 is a name known to allgreencactus3 is a name known to allgreencactus3 is a name known to allgreencactus3 is a name known to allgreencactus3 is a name known to allgreencactus3 is a name known to all
Send a message via AIM to greencactus3 Send a message via MSN to greencactus3
Re: Shifting Efficiently

in mpg efficiency, shifting into a higher gear close to stall. which means running the engine with the least rpms possible. not too good for the engine in the long run. but it doesnt use as much gas. ( idont think.. correct me if im wrong)
and for acceleration, read http://www.allpar.com/eek/hp-vs-torque.html which comprehensibly teaches why shifting at redline would be the fastest way to accelerate
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2004, 16:01
Steve W Steve W is offline
Grow Up? Why?
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Toronto,Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,523
Steve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond reputeSteve W has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Shifting Efficiently

I may be wrong but running close to stall means that the engine has to work harder to maintain speed thus using more gas. Every vehicle is different. A lot depends on gearing. I get my best gas mileage at about 1800 - 1900 prm.
__________________
We do not stop playing because we grow old;
we grow old because we stop playing.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2004, 16:36
tkwetzel's Avatar
tkwetzel tkwetzel is offline
Good Luck Teams!
AKA: Tyler Wetzel
FRC #0116 (Epsilon Delta)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Posts: 1,241
tkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond reputetkwetzel has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to tkwetzel
Re: Shifting Efficiently

As already stated, it depends on the car, more so on the engine in the car. A good visual is a chart showing the power and torque curves like this one . The darker line is the torque curve and the lighter line is the power curve. As you can see, the torque peaks at just over 4000 rpm. With my understanding, the most efficient time is to shift right at the top of the torque curve, however, if you do not need to gain much more speed, shifting at a lower rpm is probably more efficient. Also, the power efficiency is such that shifting at the top of the torque curve should give you the best acceleration, not shifting at redline as greencactus said. Running the engine at lower rpm's is better in the long run. It is more efficeint on gas and causes less wear on the engine. An engine will last the longest if it is running smoothly at the lowest possible speed without stalling.
__________________
See you in DC!
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2004, 19:40
Unsung FIRST Hero
Mike Betts Mike Betts is offline
Electrical Engineer
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rookie Year: 1995
Location: Homosassa, FL
Posts: 1,442
Mike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Shifting Efficiently

Ok... This is an electrical guy talking so I apologize, in advance, and invite the MechE's to correct me.

For DC motors, max torque is at stall and max speed is at no torque. Maximum power is at 1/2 speed and 1/2 torque. Each gear ratio will have a power curve associated with it. You want to shift exactly where the power curves for each gear ratio intersect.

I'm not sure if this applies to the ICU but I believe it applies to our robots.

Is there at Mechanical Engineer out there to set me straight?
__________________
Mike Betts

Alumnus, Team 3518, Panthrobots, 2011
Alumnus, Team 177, Bobcat Robotics, 1995 - 2010
LRI, Connecticut Regional, 2007-2010
LRI, WPI Regional, 2009 - 2010
RI, South Florida Regional, 2012 - 2013

As easy as 355/113...
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 10-12-2004, 21:30
Unsung FIRST Hero
JVN JVN is offline
@JohnVNeun
AKA: John Vielkind-Neun
FRC #0148 (Robowranglers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Greenville, Tx
Posts: 3,159
JVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond reputeJVN has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Shifting Efficiently

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Betts

Is there at Mechanical Engineer out there to set me straight?
Mike,
You are 100% correct as far as robots go. I'm not familiar with ICU's but that is how DC motors work.

Refer to attachment:
This is just a quick graph showing some random motor (a chiaphua, actually) with 4 different gear ratios. 1:2, 1:1, 2:1, 4:1.

You can see in the plot how in order to maintain optimal power usage at all speeds, you need to "bounce along the peaks", and shift where the plots intersect. Ideally, you could use a CVT to vary your gear ration and ALWAYS stay at max power (rather than bounce up and down).

Hope this makes SOME sense,
John
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Shift Points.jpg
Views:	109
Size:	51.6 KB
ID:	2678  
__________________
In the interest of full disclosure: I work for VEX Robotics a subsidiary of Innovation First International (IFI) Crown Supplier & Proud Supporter of FIRST
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 11-12-2004, 00:18
JessR JessR is offline
Registered User
#0571 (Team Paragon)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Windsor, CT
Posts: 27
JessR will become famous soon enough
Re: Shifting Efficiently

Well any internal combustion engine has more complicated & interdependent processes going on than a DC electric motor, so simple absolute linear rules of behavior are not there (peak torque at half max rpm etc).
The processes such as combustion, gas thermodynamics, compressible fluid flow of the air in/exhaust gasses out are all interrelated and vary with engine load, rpm, air temperature, resonant frequencies of the intake/exhaust plumbing etc.
However, that being said keep in mind that all ICE are heat engines which function by converting the heat energy of a fuel into expanding a gas that pushes on and moves the pistons/crankshaft.
So work is done - force x distance.

Here are rules of thumb I keep in mind:
1. I recall from somewhere that the maximum combustion efficiency of a motor is at it's peak torque (maximum area under the torque/speed curve).
For most car motors that's around 3000 to 4000 rpm.

2. On the other hand, internal sliding friction of the pistons/bearings is essentially linear for each revolution of the motor. So, all else being equal, if you can get your desired output hp (say to maintain 30 mph) at half the motor rpm, you will eliminate half the engine revolutions and half the sliding friction in the motor to go a given distance. Less wasted energy in the motor = higher efficiency & mpg.

3. The optimum efficiency for a given motor is at lowest rpm that still gives good combustion efficiency. Crossover of the friction loss & combustion efficiency curves. Motor's with good torque at low speed, good combustion effieciency and low thermal losses win.

...Any FIRST engineers out there from the motor city with some more detail? Hey speak out FORD, GM, Daimler guys!
__________________
2004 UTC New England Champions with 716 & 230

Engineering Lead
Team Paragon #571
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 14-12-2004, 13:28
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,798
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Shifting Efficiently

Quote:
Originally Posted by JessR

3. The optimum efficiency for a given motor is at lowest rpm that still gives good combustion efficiency. Crossover of the friction loss & combustion efficiency curves. Motor's with good torque at low speed, good combustion effieciency and low thermal losses win.

...Any FIRST engineers out there from the motor city with some more detail? Hey speak out FORD, GM, Daimler guys!
I checked with a knowledgeable person on this subject and I will try and sum up what I think I heard. Jess is right on the subjects so far. My friend also clued me into modern drivetrain design and efficiencies and suggested that the lower the engine speed and the higher the gear tend to be the most efficient but are vastly affected by the control computers cutting in to modify operation (i.e. trans and engine). For the most part the design shift point takes into account all of the variables mentioned above with the addition of the designers choice for reserve power, i.e. being able to speed up without having to downshift. ( I am going to make a vast departure here and make an assumption.) I am guessing that in high gear at say 60-70 MPH is likely the engine RPM at it's most efficient point. For most cars I have driven (other than a Mazda RX 4) that seems to be in the 3000-4000 range the same as Jess pointed out above. My Honda and Toyota four bangers in the 80's shifted lower than that (about 2500-3000) but didn't have a lot in the way of engine mod and emmission control.
Now my dad ( a mechanic) always taught me to feel and listen to the engine, it's trying to talk to you. If you shift too soon, the engine balks (a lot of power vibration) until you speed up (more RPM). Shift too late and the engine is screaming at you to shift. At the right point, the engine is happy, the trans is happy and you are happy.

On my RX 4, 4000 RPM=70 MPH, red line at 7000, 10 MPH/500RPM you do the math. I never found a point where power fell off. Oh WOW!
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.

Last edited by Al Skierkiewicz : 14-12-2004 at 13:33.
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 18-12-2004, 11:42
Wetzel's Avatar
Wetzel Wetzel is offline
DC Robotics
FRC #2914 (Tiger Pride)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: DC
Posts: 3,522
Wetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Wetzel
Re: Shifting Efficiently

Thanks Al. I've always driven by listening to the car, but didn't realize it until I was driving on a nice day, but the windows down and music up, and started having some problems in heavy traffic. Music down, shift happy.

I guess I'll be content with a happy car. I think I've matured past having my engine scream at me.


Wetzel
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is a shifting transmission really necessary? Jay TenBrink Technical Discussion 78 02-08-2005 09:21
Automatic Shifting Algorithm phrontist Programming 10 29-07-2004 22:47
Slotted Nuts and Shifting sanddrag Technical Discussion 6 07-03-2004 13:04
3 shifting transmission... Arefin Bari Technical Discussion 19 04-03-2004 01:24
gear shifting Stephen Kowski Motors 19 30-03-2003 21:33


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi