We stand on shoulders of giants

[phrontist]

The impression I'm getting is that most of the people who oppose the logo change object to it mostly because they see it as a step in the wrong direction graphically not because of their resistance to change. I think resistance would be reduced tenfold if FIRST had produced a logo that was an enhancement, and the concensus seems to be that this is not the case. How much has been invested into changing the logo? Is it too late to turn back? Or do we have to plow on lest we risk destroying our "Brand Image Consistency"

Essentially, I don't think people are afraid of change, their just afraid of that *shudder* grotesque abberation