|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2004 Electrical Component Rule Rationale
I personally think this rule is unnecessary and overly restrictive. I have run into problems with this rule several times. The selection of sensors from the approved vendors is rather limited. I think a better rule would be one that limits the max price per part, and states that the part must be available to all teams.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How Many FIRST shirts do you own? | Joe Ross | General Forum | 81 | 31-08-2004 10:36 |
| A Real Transformer? (the robots, not the electrical component) | Nick Seidl | Chit-Chat | 2 | 02-04-2004 12:23 |
| BLOWN COMPONENT! In need of 2004 Robot controller to borrow for 2 days | Michael Luedtke | Electrical | 9 | 22-02-2004 22:15 |
| Looking for unusual electrical component | JamesJones | Electrical | 11 | 08-07-2003 20:36 |