|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#331
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
Maybe a field element like a bridge over an obstacle can be assumed? One can only guess. For those who do like math *not me* here is an extensive research of pi. http://www.jimloy.com/geometry/pi.htm And look, it even has reference to pyramids for you pyramid theory buffs. http://www.jimloy.com/pseudo/pyramid.htm |
|
#332
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
|
|
#334
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here is a couple ideas:
1. What is there is a total new bot design what if FIRST has purchased hexpod kits from Pi Products and a total new starting point for team bots. 2. What if FIRST has their own bot (hexpod) with IR beacon mounted on it?thus the need for tinted glasses 3. First base men = FIRST 4. I totally agree 3x3. 5. Specific scoring objects for each team and other objects that both teams can score with? My $.02 Mentor 1557 (12 volt bolt) |
|
#335
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
I think that It would be great for FIRST to do something new and such as the hex Field or bot or whatever it may be and to do 3v3 because it would really level the field for rookie teams and very experienced vets so everyone has a much better chance. a team could have been around for 8 years or more but they would have the same amount of experience at building a bot that had to work on a hex Field or had to bridge a gap in someway as a rookie team would have to.
|
|
#336
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
2) Why would tinted glasses help you with an IR beacon? |
|
#337
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
|
|
#338
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
first base?
|
|
#339
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
|
|
#340
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
Now that's a neat idea! Having the autonomous mode at some unspecified time during the match to accomplish a task only accessible through autonomous would force everyone to use sensors - IR, light, sound, whatever - no more of that dead-reckonin' stuff our team, for one, uses every year. Now, just for fun, I'm going to try to contrive a rediculous, surface level connection to the clue. Quote:
1. "Pi" is interpreted as "the product" as stated in earlier posts 2. "The product" is assumed to indicate the end of a match (the product of the efforts) 3. The lack of a comma between "You and Me" is interpreted such that "You and Me" are between the beginning and the end of the match 4. "You and Me" indicates the connection between George Burns and John Neun 5. The connection is assumed to be the unassisted triple plays 6. "Unassisted" can be considered loosely synonymous with "autonomous" if "autonomous"'s definition is taken as "independent" then it can be gathered that at some undefined point during the match, teams will have an opportunity to complete a task in autonomous mode, possibly with some relation to the "three" of the triple play. ~~**~~ WOW! That was fun! Give me another illogical point to argue! ![]() |
|
#341
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
|
|
#342
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
To all the people who believe in the Beatles reference, I've got it! What FIRST is trying to convey to us is that at regional events, the DJs will no longer play repetitive techno and pop music over and over and over and... but will instead culture us with Dave Lavery's extensive collection of the Beatles' works, as mentioned earlier by Lil Lavery.
... not that I'm saying the music is annoying sometimes ![]() |
|
#343
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Quote:
Honestly, I'm terrified! I mean, last year we barely even managed to make our robot MOVE during autonomous. Unfortunately, it has been emphasized over and over again that autonomous control is more similar to what most robots do in the real world, and I've heard that FIRST is moving more and more towards using autonomous. This seems like a logical step that could make autonomous control much more powerful without taking time or challenge away from the rest of the match.This is coming soon, I think, whether or not it's this year, but it's my pet theory that this clue will have something to do with autonomous, though I can't really say why. |
|
#344
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Friend of mine analyzed the quote and immediately thought of pie wedges....any chance?
|
|
#345
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Official 2005 Clue Thread
Just a few things I've noticed thus far:
1. Multiple floors, lowered control stations and a gigantic pyramid are all impractical because in order for them to support one robot (or more) would mean intense structural design. Sure, we all pitched in an extra $1000, but I'm pretty sure thats something known as economics. That extra $1000 isn't to cover new parts or a ridiculous skyscraper shaped field. That is so FIRST can get more money. Also, think about a multi story field or pyramid. At the end of a match, do you use a crane to get them down? Not likely, some venues won't allow it. 2. Another thought, George Burns is an actor who played God in a movie called "God." The game may be referencing to a scene or part from the movie. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 5th Annual Ramp Riot (Official Thread) | OZ_341 | Off-Season Events | 56 | 18-11-2004 05:05 |
| [Official 2005 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2005 game... | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 37 | 26-10-2004 23:15 |
| Official Kettering Kickoff Music Thread | Swan217 | Off-Season Events | 4 | 15-08-2004 18:08 |