|
|
|
 In my opinion, the hardest part of the competition is not that actual manufacture of the robot, but the design process. It is the enginners that go through the design process all the time that will have the edge in this competition, not the best machinist. - Wetzel [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
06-01-2005, 19:51
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2004 Electrical Component Rule Rationale
Back to the original topic for this thread...
Given my reading of the message from FIRST today regarding parts suppliers, it seemed clear to me that the supplier I used for the PS/2 interface chip may now be legal. Hallelujah!!! So I sent a message off to Al Williams, Inc. - the supplier for the chip. My question to him was simple: Did he feel that his company would meet the specified criteria? I'll post his response here once I get it. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How Many FIRST shirts do you own? | Joe Ross | General Forum | 81 | 31-08-2004 10:36 |
| A Real Transformer? (the robots, not the electrical component) | Nick Seidl | Chit-Chat | 2 | 02-04-2004 12:23 |
| BLOWN COMPONENT! In need of 2004 Robot controller to borrow for 2 days | Michael Luedtke | Electrical | 9 | 22-02-2004 22:15 |
| Looking for unusual electrical component | JamesJones | Electrical | 11 | 08-07-2003 20:36 |
Threaded Mode