|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#31
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Worm Gear Gearbox
Quote:
|
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Worm Gear Gearbox
Quote:
*make sure you get the correct material properties as different treatments can change properties(case hardening etc.) Last edited by Jizvonius : 07-01-2005 at 12:59. |
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Worm Gear Gearbox
What are "starts"? The number of threads? I thought the number of threads was equivalent to the number of teeth so more threads is less reduction (and i would assume more efficient)
|
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Worm Gear Gearbox
Quote:
If you look at the side of the worm, you should see the places where thread starts, that's a "start". The number of starts will change the gear ratio. i refer you to Paul's post. Quote:
|
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Worm Gear Gearbox
Yes, you are correct. I got just about everything back wards. In an attempt to make up for it, Here is a decent link that some pretty good info on worms... http://www.bostongear.com/pdf/gear_theory.pdf Pages 13 and 14
Last edited by Bacchus : 07-01-2005 at 13:51. |
|
#36
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Worm Gear Gearbox
Quote:
On the shoulder joint of our elbow for last year's TechnoKat robot, we used a 40 tooth worm gear (Martin # W1240) and a single threaded worm gear (Martin # WG12). This design worked well, except when the arm would bounce or hit something. The teeth on the worm gear would shear. If we ever need to use this sort gearing again for an arm, we will need to do two things: 1. use a gear with larger teeth 2. provide more of a counterbalance for this same sort of joint Andy B. |
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Worm Gear Gearbox
I definitley do not think I could do my own calculation for teeth strength. It's far more complicated then simply shear strength for that material. There are multiple engagement points at a given time, and even just calculating the area being sheared isn't simple. I need to know this for design purposes, so I can't wait to receive the part and any info it comes with. None of the gear supplier websites I have checked list the formula.
|
|
#38
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Worm Gear Gearbox
Quote:
When it comes to dynamic and shock loading, the engineering gets waaay more complicated. For our applications in FIRST robots, I suggest using the gear strength calculations linked above at the Stock Drive website. Depending on what you will be doing with your gears, you can then put in a safety factor to absorb dynamic and shock situations. Andy B. |
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Worm Gear Gearbox
I've read SDP's technical section and I still cannot find any information for worm gears. Even if the gear always breaks before the worm, the calculations are not comparable because the number of meshing teeth is very different and worm gears often have a sort of concave curve in the tooth to increase mesh that further changes the mechanics.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| gears | Michael Leicht | Inventor | 12 | 16-09-2004 10:52 |
| Reverse Gear | FizMan | Technical Discussion | 12 | 26-04-2004 01:29 |
| Van Door Worm Gear | Jim Giacchi | Motors | 4 | 16-12-2003 09:35 |
| what's your most important drive train advice? | Ken Leung | Technical Discussion | 42 | 07-01-2003 09:58 |
| "Motors and Drive train edition" of Fresh From the Forum | Ken Leung | CD Forum Support | 6 | 29-01-2002 12:32 |