|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IMPORTANT 2005 CHANGES!!!!
An Ode to Drill Motors...
Heres to Makita, Milwaukee, Bosch...you powered drive trains I'll always remember...the likes of Atlas and Hexcalibur, tank drives both. You pushed freshman around the cafe on team information night. You gave your all, stripped a few gears, and blew a few clutches. You powered many a team to Victor(y). So long old friends.... I know that they've pretty much been replaced by globe motors as the favorite for drive systems, but being so old school it is sad to see the drill motors go. They've been a staple of the FIRST kit of parts since, well probably not the begining but darn close I'd imagine. One more thing that I can bring out at a compention to get weird looks from rookies in a few years ;-) Good luck to all teams this year...should be a fun game, Justin Last edited by Justin : 09-01-2005 at 22:04. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IMPORTANT 2005 CHANGES!!!!
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IMPORTANT 2005 CHANGES!!!!
but a sweet $350 camera system
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IMPORTANT 2005 CHANGES!!!!
But we get 2 more atwoods, which are so much better than the bosch's anyway.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IMPORTANT 2005 CHANGES!!!!
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IMPORTANT 2005 CHANGES!!!!
That's good about the weight... You actually have more weight to work with... The battery is 13 pounds... So technically you have 3 extra pounds to work with... WOOT!
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IMPORTANT 2005 CHANGES!!!!
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IMPORTANT 2005 CHANGES!!!!
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IMPORTANT 2005 CHANGES!!!!
Quote:
<_< >_> Yeah, that must be it. ![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: IMPORTANT 2005 CHANGES!!!!
Quote:
The globe motors are much smaller than the CIM motors. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: IMPORTANT 2005 CHANGES!!!!
I think the fact that alternates have been eliminated is extremely significant.
On the upside, an alliance won't be left stranded in the case of a mechanical malfunction. Since strategy is paramount it will be important to have as many functioning robots available as possible. Also, this will give teams that were balanced on the edge a chance to make it into finals when they may not otherwise get that chance. I'm sorry if I missed this part, but how exactly would these alternates be picked? On the downside, a team won't be able to reenter competition even if they fix themselves. This puts a lot of stress in the alliance. So if the standby team breaks, they're essentially stuck again. I wonder if there will be any team updates on this subject? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/Important 2005 Competition Manual Information | Sscamatt | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 1 | 06-01-2005 18:50 |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/Advance Material List for the 2005 Competition Now Available! | Travis Hoffman | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 0 | 05-01-2005 16:46 |
| A time for reflection as we approach 2005 | Ken Leung | General Forum | 7 | 07-11-2004 20:55 |
| [Official 2005 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2005 game... | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 37 | 26-10-2004 23:15 |
| Your Thoughts on the 2005 Championship Eligibility Criteria! | dez250 | Championship Event | 57 | 10-09-2004 14:59 |