|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is there a maximum number of stacked tetras?
I read the stacked rule as saying all stacked tetras must have their apex(top vertex) within 6 inches of the goal's apex. This would mean only the first 3 or four tetras would count for being stacked. Is that correct, or does "stacked" mean any tetra seated properly is considered worth 3 points.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is there a maximum number of stacked tetras?
I read that rule also and didn't quite know what to make of it. Sounds like a good Q&A for FIRST.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is there a maximum number of stacked tetras?
That's not possible because only the first (you definitley cannot fit more than one in 6 inches, forget 3 or 4) tetra would count and then the animation is entirely wrong.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is there a maximum number of stacked tetras?
According to the game section of the manual:
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Is there a maximum number of stacked tetras?
Good point...
In the definitions: "STACKED is defined as TETRA is placed on top of a GOAL or on top of another STACKED TETRA." "The TETRA must be properly seated on the subordinate GOAL or TETRA such that all four APEX connectors are within six inches of the SUPPORTING structure." Given that definition, I would assume that you can stack as many TETRAs as possible! (try getting 66 TETRAs ON and OFF of the center goal.... ) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Q/A questions so far.. | AmyPrib | Rules/Strategy | 49 | 28-01-2005 08:39 |
| Maximum Number of Capped Tetras? | thoughtful | Rules/Strategy | 26 | 15-01-2005 00:32 |
| Just where are vision "bonus" tetras placed? | David Brinza | Rules/Strategy | 17 | 10-01-2005 20:50 |
| pic: Tetras Stacked | Mark McLeod | Extra Discussion | 2 | 09-01-2005 17:53 |
| WASH scouting fields | Mike Soukup | Scouting | 0 | 04-02-2002 02:39 |