|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Universal goal location designations
OK, here's the shortest, and seems to be easy to remember:
Far Left........Far Mid........Far Right Mid Left........CENTER........Mid Right Near Left......Near Mid.......Near Right Everything's two sylables ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Hope you like it, i think its what i'll use |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Universal goal location designations
Quote:
FL, FC, FR CL, CC, CR HL, HC, HR I would say either this one (in the above quote) or the number-pad one: opponent 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 your alliance since our minds tend to think right to left, top to bottom, this should be pretty easy to remember |
|
#18
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Universal goal location designations
Quote:
Blue left == Blue center == Blue right Mid left == Mid center == Mid Right Red Left == Red Center == Red Right Of course you would have to remember which end of the field you are on. If you eliminate left and right (ie. blue auto, blue center, blue human or blue back, blue center, blue front) this would also work for the announcer calling the match. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Universal goal location designations
Quote:
I would like to suggest a slight change to the above, namely saying the row before the column. That seems a little easier for me to spit out for some reason. So it would be "Row 1 left" and which would be abbreviated as follows: 3 left . . . . . 3 center . . . . . 3 right 2 left . . . . . 2 center . . . . . 2 right 1 left . . . . . 1 center . . . . . 1 right |
|
#20
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Universal goal location designations
Quote:
|
|
#21
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Universal goal location designations
I believe that there are a total of 23 "known" positions on the field for each alliance's robot. Count out loud if you want:
nine (9) goals four (4) visual tetras to go after two (2) auto-load stations two (2) manual-load stations three (3) starting locations (OK, pretty much a "known") three (3) finishing stations Therefore, I suggest that everyone memorize the military radio alphabet. Calls on the filed might go something like this: "Team ALPHA, drive your robot to location ZULU" "Team BRAVO, drive your robot to loader at location "TANGO" You get the picture...... Alpha, Bravo, Charlie, Dog, Echo, Foxtrot......... Over and out for now |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Universal goal location designations
I polled our coaches, drivers, button pushers, and human players as well as the mentors, teachers, and a few parents. The number pad idea was the winner with above 90%. Perhaps a poll is called for? We are in favor of a universal code...we would like to keep it simple.
Ken |
|
#23
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Universal goal location designations
Quote:
|
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Universal goal location designations
I like Pakrat's suggestion
Far Left........Far Mid........Far Right Mid Left........CENTER........Mid Right Near Left......Near Mid.......Near Right It's probably what I'll be using. Any driver can understand it, even if it's their first time looking at the field. If you tell a new driver to cap goal 8, they'll probably have no idea what your taking about. But if you say cap the Far Mid goal, they'll know which one. |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Universal goal location designations
It seems to me that the number pad concept has the highest chance of causing confusion… however it is the fastest. Saying “five” vs “Center Center”
Although it may be harder for someone who hasn’t heard of the key pad naming scheme. Where as Center Center is obvious. In all things there are trade offs… |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Universal goal location designations
I would hope that each team has their own way of communicating goals between themselves atleast... My driver better know what goal 8 is when i start screamin at him.. I would hope that there is better ties between the coaches and the drivers that they would not know what terminology the coach is using.. a universal would be great.. especially between alliance members.. the numbers seem to be the easiest, but i would drop #6 and put CENTER in there... that is a no-brainer to anyone, without thinkin.
j |
|
#27
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Universal goal location designations
I think right now I like Doug Hogg's suggestion best.
Using numbered rows allows you to use hand signals (one, two, or three fingers) for the number of the row, and point your thumb left, up, or right for position. 3 left . . . . . 3 center . . . . . 3 right 2 left . . . . . 2 center . . . . . 2 right 1 left . . . . . 1 center . . . . . 1 right |
|
#28
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Universal goal location designations
Quote:
Or one other thought that's easy with hand signals: 31.....32.....33 21.....22.....23 11.....12.....13 |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Universal goal location designations
The Gila Monsters plan on making laminated index cards of whichever universal form is finally decided upon by the CD community. We will give the cards to all the coaches of all the teams at the Arizona, Colorado, and Las Vegas Regionals.
Ken |
|
#30
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Universal goal location designations
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FIRST and Success: A Question of Definition | Madison | General Forum | 70 | 27-11-2002 08:42 |
| Small balls in 2001 competition | archiver | 2001 | 10 | 24-06-2002 03:59 |
| Curie Division Robots information... (not complete) | archiver | 2001 | 3 | 24-06-2002 03:13 |
| Just curious, how many robots could shoot or toss balls into the goal? | Alan Ing | General Forum | 7 | 13-05-2002 19:09 |
| IS THIS RIGHT?!?!? | RebAl | General Forum | 22 | 31-03-2002 00:07 |