|
|
|
 The weight sounds about right, too. If you need more than 65 pounds for your manipulator, then the drivetrain isn't the part you should be redesigning... - s_forbes [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| The weight sounds about right, too. If you need more than 65 pounds for your manipulator, then the drivetrain isn't the part you should be redesigning... - s_forbes [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#13
19-01-2005, 22:11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: we're done
We were thinking wedges but realized its just toooooo HIGH! its worse than 2001, were gonna need to "get low" to cap the biggy, a crane design would support the weight better, f+d=d+f basically says, having a 10 pound tetra hanging more than 2 feet out of the arm will topple almost anything unless you get some serious support for the base
Last edited by UlTiMaTeP : 19-01-2005 at 22:20. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: Panoramic Pic from Nationals 2001 | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 19 | 23-03-2004 23:38 |
| pic: Team PIC of 354 Westinghouse HS | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 4 | 29-02-2004 12:15 |
| pic: pic 1 | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 6 | 22-02-2004 00:29 |
| pic: Another pic of Team 930 | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 7 | 25-02-2003 21:07 |
Threaded Mode