|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Are 100k Ohm pots necessary?
I'm trying to find high quality single turn potentiometers and having a difficult time finding them at the 100K ohm requirement. I understand that the Robot Controller's manual indicates you should always use 100K potentiometers. But is it really necessary? What could be the disastrous result of using for instance a 5K potentiometer?
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Are 100k Ohm pots necessary?
Mike,
I have the input equivalent circuit around here someplace. I will continue to try and find it so it will help understanding the circuit. In the mean time, the 100K pot is selected to work with the input circuitry on the RC and the OI. The pot is connected to an A to D convertor through some input protection circuitry in each of the devices. Note that the wiring is different for the RC and OI analog inputs. Additionally, joysticks use the 100K pots. |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Are 100k Ohm pots necessary?
It was my understanding that the A to D converter simply compares the voltage on the signal line to it's 5 volt reference. What would happen if you were to use a 5K pot?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Are 100k Ohm pots necessary?
If you really want "high quality" use a stepped attenuator...
Any <100k> pot should do, as long as it's controlable... if you are worried about bad tracking, noise, etc thats a fact of life. If you want a really high qaulity pot you might be able to find a pana evj or alps blue velvet in 100k varieties... |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Are 100k Ohm pots necessary?
Quote:
You would probably get away with it... Let me extend your line of reasoning: Q: What would happen if I use a 10 ohm pot? A: I doubt if the 5V internal power supply in the RC can provide 5V/10ohm=0.5A of current. I would think that 100K is probably a value such that a team could use 100K pots on all analog inputs simultaneously and it would work. For a definitive answer, I would post on the IFI Technical Forum. Regards, |
|
#6
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Are 100k Ohm pots necessary?
Quote:
The input circuitry for the microprocessor is on page 217 of the datasheet. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Are 100k Ohm pots necessary?
In the IFI Forum it says the Robot Controller is capable of sourcing 1 Amp of current on the 5V I/O headers.
I obviously don't want to draw more current than I have to, but I have been having difficulty finding 100K precision single turn pots. After looking at the schematic it seems impossible to draw more than 5mA of current due to the 1K Ohm resistor in series with the load. I'll submit this as a question to the IFI Forum. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Are 100k Ohm pots necessary?
Thanks, Joe.
Mike, if you take a look at the input circuit you will see the series resistor and capacitor. This circuit does a little low pass filter. (about 3kHz) Since this is a simplified drawing, you can guess that the A/D that follows is selected (optimized) for a particular input current/frequency in order to track and remain linear. The 100K value allows that, but a 10K would not. It is not a matter of possible damage, just not predictable results or noise immunity. Last edited by Al Skierkiewicz : 17-01-2005 at 15:46. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are 100k Ohm pots necessary?
Here is a high quality 100kohm pot we have used before:
http://www.digikey.com/scripts/DkSea...423225&Site=US They arn't cheap, but its practically impossible to break the stops on them. That particular model is the long shaft version, they are also avilable in a short shaft version (but its far easier to shorten a shaft than lengthen a shaft, so we usually buy long shaft versions and cut them down to whatever we need). |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Are 100k Ohm pots necessary?
IFI has updated the 2005 Robot Controller Reference Guide. The new potentiometer requirement is:
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Are 100k Ohm pots necessary?
Cool!
Thanks. |
|
#12
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Are 100k Ohm pots necessary?
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Are 100k Ohm pots necessary?
Just wanted to point out that
Quote:
For those who are interested, this is done so that if there is no joystick plugged in, the analog inputs get pulled down to 0V and the OI can detect this and in turn send 127 to the robot (instead of 0). It's a safety feature so that if your joysticks get unplugged your robot doesn't start driving backwards at full speed. |
|
#14
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Are 100k Ohm pots necessary?
Quote:
Thanks in advance!Don |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Are 100k Ohm pots necessary?
Sorry about that. The part # is RV4NJ104C-ND. It is made by Precision Electronics Components or something like that.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LED's, resistors, computers... ohm my! | DanL | Electrical | 3 | 01-07-2003 09:37 |
| 10 turn 100k pots | rust710 | Electrical | 5 | 02-04-2003 15:10 |
| Multi-turn pots? | MikeDubreuil | Electrical | 14 | 02-03-2003 22:47 |
| 100k Slide Pot | archiver | 2001 | 4 | 24-06-2002 02:53 |
| 3-turn pots | archiver | 2001 | 2 | 24-06-2002 01:24 |