Go to Post The spirit of FIRST lives in all of them[us]. Knowledge is power and the unknown is scarey but in the end the spirit of FIRST will endure. - LSevcik [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Other > Math and Science
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 9 votes, 4.89 average. Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2005, 18:47
Unsung FIRST Hero
Mike Betts Mike Betts is offline
Electrical Engineer
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rookie Year: 1995
Location: Homosassa, FL
Posts: 1,442
Mike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Stupid physics problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam Y.
A window washer pulls herself upward using the bucket-pulley apparatus shown in Fig. 4-40. The mass of the person plus the bucket is 64 kg. The person pulls themselves up the rope on the other side of the pully. Assuming friction doesn't apply. What is the force needed to pull the person up with a constant velocity? If she increases this acceleration by 14% how much does she accelerate. I hate my physics class. This is the only class where I do my homework online. Get the answer wrong on one part of the question, use the wrong answer for another part, and get the right answer for another part. Here is another one:
A 19.0 kg box is released on a 34.0° incline and accelerates down the incline at 0.03 m/s2. Find the friction force impeding its motion. What is Mu?
I wouldn't be asking these questions if the didn't confuse me and my teachers confuse me even more.
Adam,

My apologies for what I am about to say... These are fairly simple questions... If they confuse your teachers, find a new teacher.

JMHO
__________________
Mike Betts

Alumnus, Team 3518, Panthrobots, 2011
Alumnus, Team 177, Bobcat Robotics, 1995 - 2010
LRI, Connecticut Regional, 2007-2010
LRI, WPI Regional, 2009 - 2010
RI, South Florida Regional, 2012 - 2013

As easy as 355/113...
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2005, 18:49
Adam Y.'s Avatar
Adam Y. Adam Y. is offline
Adam Y.
no team (?????)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,979
Adam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Adam Y.
Re: Stupid physics problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Betts
Adam,

My apologies for what I am about to say... These are fairly simple questions... If they confuse your teachers, find a new teacher.

JMHO
No. Im sorry. I meant to say there replies confused me. The one person said he would have to see my work to figure out how I got the right answer for the one part and the other one tried to help me but they just confused me even more. I honestly to God went to extra help for both of these problems. The graduate student was just as confused as I am. She was a very helpful though on other problems I had "duh" moments on. I thought the answer would be 64kg * 9.8m/s2 first problem but nooo. That isn't the right answer. Please answer this also. If you get the first part wrong then you should get the wrong answer for the second part also. Right?? Im asking the last bastion of nerds that I know. Please help me....
__________________
If either a public officer or any one else saw a person attempting to cross a bridge which had been ascertained to be unsafe, and there were no time to warn him of his danger, they might seize him and turn him back without any real infringement of his liberty; for liberty consists in doing what one desires, and he does not desire to fall into the river. -Mill

Last edited by Adam Y. : 26-01-2005 at 18:56.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2005, 19:12
UsmanB UsmanB is offline
Michigan Wolverine CO/2009
None #0123 (123 Cosmos)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Hamtramck, MI
Posts: 84
UsmanB will become famous soon enough
Re: Stupid physics problem.

i did a quick search of ur problem on google and found this problem on a forum:

A window washer pulls herself upward using the bucket-pulley apparatus show in Fig. 4-42 (the woman is in a bucket, a rope tied to the top of the bucket, and she's pulling on the downward direction of rope that goes up over the pulley) (a) How hard must she pull downward to raise herself slowy at a constant speed? (b) If she increases this force by 10 percent, what will her acceleration be? The mass of the person plus the bucket is 65 kg.

This was the reply from a member.

Find the accelerations of all four parts. (g=10)

a = [(m2-m1)/(m1+m2)]g

a1 = [(180kg - 120kg)/(180kg + 120kg)]10m/s^2
a1 = 2m/s^2

a2 = [(120kg - 80kg)/(120kg + 80kg)]10m/s^2
a2 = 2m/s^2

a3 = [(80kg - 40kg)/(80kg + 40kg)]10m/s^2
a3 = 3.33m/s^2

a4 = [(40kg - 0kg)/(40kg + 0kg)]10m/s^2
a4 = 10m/s^2


Find the time in seconds.

s = .5at^2

16m = .5 (2m/s^2) t^2
t^2 = 16m
t1 = 4s

t2 = 4s (same acceleration)

16 = .5 (3.33m/s^2) t^2
t3 = 3.1s

16 = .5 (10m/s^2) t^2
16 = 5t^2
t^2 = 3.2
t4 = 1.8s

Adding the times of 4+4+3.1+1.8 = 12.9 seconds.

And for your other problem i found this on google. http://faculty.salisbury.edu/~jwhowa...l/lecture4.htm

that is the exact way to do ur problem, scroll down and u'll find a problem that reads "An 18.0 kg box is released on a 37.0° incline and accelerates down the incline at 0.270 m/s2. Find the coefficient of friction and the frictional force." and they have a picture and show u how to solve it good luck and im sure that if u looked in the chapter ur doing right now u could find perhaps an example, i know the physics book i have right now doesnt have each example for each type of problem so u have to play with equations given.

Last edited by UsmanB : 26-01-2005 at 19:16.
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2005, 19:17
Adam Y.'s Avatar
Adam Y. Adam Y. is offline
Adam Y.
no team (?????)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,979
Adam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Adam Y.
Re: Stupid physics problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UsmanB
i did a quick search of ur problem on google and found this problem on a forum:

A window washer pulls herself upward using the bucket-pulley apparatus show in Fig. 4-42 (the woman is in a bucket, a rope tied to the top of the bucket, and she's pulling on the downward direction of rope that goes up over the pulley) (a) How hard must she pull downward to raise herself slowy at a constant speed? (b) If she increases this force by 10 percent, what will her acceleration be? The mass of the person plus the bucket is 65 kg.

This was the reply from a member.

Find the accelerations of all four parts. (g=10)

a = [(m2-m1)/(m1+m2)]g

a1 = [(180kg - 120kg)/(180kg + 120kg)]10m/s^2
a1 = 2m/s^2

a2 = [(120kg - 80kg)/(120kg + 80kg)]10m/s^2
a2 = 2m/s^2

a3 = [(80kg - 40kg)/(80kg + 40kg)]10m/s^2
a3 = 3.33m/s^2

a4 = [(40kg - 0kg)/(40kg + 0kg)]10m/s^2
a4 = 10m/s^2


Find the time in seconds.

s = .5at^2

16m = .5 (2m/s^2) t^2
t^2 = 16m
t1 = 4s

t2 = 4s (same acceleration)

16 = .5 (3.33m/s^2) t^2
t3 = 3.1s

16 = .5 (10m/s^2) t^2
16 = 5t^2
t^2 = 3.2
t4 = 1.8s

Adding the times of 4+4+3.1+1.8 = 12.9 seconds.
Acckkk..... You just gave me the answer to the problem above that post. Nice try but wrong problem.
Quote:
good luck and im sure that if u looked in the chapter ur doing right now u could find perhaps an example, i know the physics book i have right now doesnt have each example for each type of problem so u have to play with equations given.
I did play with the equations. The only problem is that if Im getting the wrong answer for one part I should be getting wrong answers both parts. It's double jeporday. Get one part worng and get all the other parts wrong. Friction=Mu*FN. Well how do I get the right answer when my force of friction is wrong.
__________________
If either a public officer or any one else saw a person attempting to cross a bridge which had been ascertained to be unsafe, and there were no time to warn him of his danger, they might seize him and turn him back without any real infringement of his liberty; for liberty consists in doing what one desires, and he does not desire to fall into the river. -Mill

Last edited by Adam Y. : 26-01-2005 at 19:21.
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2005, 19:19
UsmanB UsmanB is offline
Michigan Wolverine CO/2009
None #0123 (123 Cosmos)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Hamtramck, MI
Posts: 84
UsmanB will become famous soon enough
Re: Stupid physics problem.

i thought perhaps u could see waht they did and perhaps it could help u umm here ill actually try sovling the rpoblem for u if i can. i didnt even try before.

btw the picture for that pulley problem, is there any other info in it?
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2005, 19:24
Adam Y.'s Avatar
Adam Y. Adam Y. is offline
Adam Y.
no team (?????)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,979
Adam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to beholdAdam Y. is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to Adam Y.
Re: Stupid physics problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UsmanB
i thought perhaps u could see waht they did and perhaps it could help u umm here ill actually try sovling the rpoblem for u if i can. i didnt even try before.

btw the picture for that pulley problem, is there any other info in it?
Nope. She is pulling herself in a bucket attached to a pulley. Logically here is all the information that I used. Constant velocity means no acceleration. Thus this means that there is no net force being acted upon it. That means that she must pull down with the same force that she weighs.
__________________
If either a public officer or any one else saw a person attempting to cross a bridge which had been ascertained to be unsafe, and there were no time to warn him of his danger, they might seize him and turn him back without any real infringement of his liberty; for liberty consists in doing what one desires, and he does not desire to fall into the river. -Mill
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2005, 19:47
UsmanB UsmanB is offline
Michigan Wolverine CO/2009
None #0123 (123 Cosmos)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Hamtramck, MI
Posts: 84
UsmanB will become famous soon enough
Re: Stupid physics problem.

i did it and got -.620 for the mu. and the force in x and y direction are 98.1 and -158.17
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2005, 22:51
Pat Fairbank's Avatar
Pat Fairbank Pat Fairbank is offline
Circuit Breaker
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,132
Pat Fairbank has a reputation beyond reputePat Fairbank has a reputation beyond reputePat Fairbank has a reputation beyond reputePat Fairbank has a reputation beyond reputePat Fairbank has a reputation beyond reputePat Fairbank has a reputation beyond reputePat Fairbank has a reputation beyond reputePat Fairbank has a reputation beyond reputePat Fairbank has a reputation beyond reputePat Fairbank has a reputation beyond reputePat Fairbank has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Pat Fairbank
Re: Stupid physics problem.

I did the second problem and got the force of friction = 103.55 N, and mu = 0.67.

First, you find the weight of the box.
w=mg=(19)(9.8)=186.2 N

Then you find the parallel force and the normal force.
Fp=w*sin(angle)=186.2*sin(34)=104.12
Fn=w*cos(angle)=186.2*cos(34)=154.37

So by F=ma:
Fp - F(friction) = ma
104.12 - F(friction) = (19)(0.03)
F(friction)=103.55 N

Now we can solve for mu:
F(friction)=mu*Fn
103.55=mu*154.37
mu=0.67

Does this help at all?
__________________
Patrick Fairbank
Team 254 | Mentor (2012-)
Team 1503 | Mentor (2007-2011)
Team 296 | Alumnus (2001-2004) | Mentor (2005-2006)

patfairbank.com
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2005, 23:05
russell's Avatar
russell russell is offline
Registered User
#1430 (WRONG)
Team Role: Electrical
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Anchorage AK
Posts: 402
russell is a name known to allrussell is a name known to allrussell is a name known to allrussell is a name known to allrussell is a name known to allrussell is a name known to all
Re: Stupid physics problem.

Quote:
Constant velocity means no acceleration. Thus this means that there is no net force being acted upon it. That means that she must pull down with the same force that she weighs.
I have never taken physics, so feel free to ignore this but I would think that if she was pulling down with force equal to that with which gravity acts on her body then she would not go anywhere at all. She would stay exactly where she was. In order for there to be no acceleration (or constant velocity) all she would have to do is pull with constant force.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2005, 23:27
Gary Dillard's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Gary Dillard Gary Dillard is offline
Generator of Entropy
AKA: you know, the old bald guy
FRC #2973 (The Mad Rockers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 1,582
Gary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond reputeGary Dillard has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Gary Dillard
Re: Stupid physics problem.

I don't know what you've already covered in Physics, but before I answer your problems you'll have to indulge me in a story......
I took Physics my freshman year of college, and we had 3 exams which were all worth 33 points. The class average on each one was about 12; the second highest score on each one was 18-19; one kid got a 33 on the first test and a 32 on the second; he didn't have to take the final. I remember looking at the problems in my Physics book with a blank dumb stare - how were we expected to understand this stuff?
Fast forward 3 years. I walked into a room of a freshman, he had the exact same Physics text book and the exact same blank dumb stare on his face. I looked at what he was doing, showed him how to solve the problems in about 5 minutes, and he thought I was some kind of genius. That's when I realized that it just takes alot of practice and exposure to different methods for it to sink in. We covered the same material in Physics, then Statics, then Dynamics, then strength of materials, then machine design, then mechanics - when you use the same stuff in different applications somewhere along the line it sinks in. I'm not sure when it did for me, but it did. So don't give up.

Anyway, for both of these problems you need to draw a free body diagram, which shows all of the forces acting on a system or body. If they equal zero, you have a statics or constant velocity problem. If they don't equal zero, you have a dynamics problem.

Number 1a: constant velocity means forces up equals forces down.
Total force acting down = m*g
Total forces acting up (I'm assuming there's a single pulley at the top) equals F {the tension in the rope pulling on the bucket} + F {the tension in the rope pulling on your hands, which equals the force you are pulling on the rope}. Note that the tension along any point on the rope is equal to F. Therefore, 2*F=mg, F=mg/2 = (64)*9.81/2 = 314 Newtons
Number 1b: I'm guessing you meant increase force by 14%, but it doesn't matter.
Total force acting down = m*g
Total forces acting up = 2*F*1.14 = m*g*1.14
Difference = m*g*(1.14-1) = m*g*.14 = net force
Since F=m*a, m*a=m*g*.14, or a = .14g or 1.373 m/s^2

Number 2: sum forces normal to the plane
F = m*g*cos(34)
sum forces parallel to the plane
m*g*sin(34) - (mu)*(F) = m*a, or
m*g*sin(34) - (mu)*m*g*cos(34) = m*a
The mass term falls out
[9.81*sin(34)-(.03)]/[9.81*cos(34)] = .67 = mu
__________________
Close enough to taste it, too far to reach it
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 27-01-2005, 06:15
Denman's Avatar
Denman Denman is offline
Tie Wrap-Not Cable Tie or Zip tie
AKA: Stephen Denman
FRC #0759 (Systemetric)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 817
Denman has much to be proud ofDenman has much to be proud ofDenman has much to be proud ofDenman has much to be proud ofDenman has much to be proud ofDenman has much to be proud ofDenman has much to be proud ofDenman has much to be proud ofDenman has much to be proud of
Send a message via ICQ to Denman Send a message via AIM to Denman Send a message via MSN to Denman Send a message via Yahoo to Denman
Re: Stupid physics problem.

Quote:
Originally Posted by UsmanB
i did it and got -.620 for the mu. and the force in x and y direction are 98.1 and -158.17
ey?
mu < 0 ? lol that implies the friction on the slope is accelerating object down the slope, and friction acts against the slope...
__________________
I am an ex-member of team 759.
759: regional winners with 522 and 233 NYC (2004)


FIRSTWiki.org - Contribute, learn, inspire.

"Teach the way of the GP and the way of the GP shall teach you" - Me

Last edited by Denman : 27-01-2005 at 10:59.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Programming Problem: Extremely Frustrating chantilly_team Programming 19 12-02-2005 23:00
Physics Problem Venkatesh Math and Science 13 30-11-2004 20:30
Funky Physics problem. Elgin Clock Math and Science 4 29-09-2004 13:00
The problem with scouting... archiver 2001 10 23-06-2002 23:49
Major problem with chipphua motors aka Scott White Motors 18 19-03-2002 19:44


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:49.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi