|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Stupid physics problem.
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Stupid physics problem.
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stupid physics problem.
ya i know i probalby did somethign wrong, some how when i did cos 34 i kept getting an negative number :S oh well i was close! im taking my first high school physics class right now
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Stupid physics problem.
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Stupid physics problem.
For the box one, remember that
f = uN (N is normal force, perpindicular to the slope, pushing up on box) To find normal force, resolve the weight (mg) of the box into components perpindicular and parralel to the slope, by taking the sin and cos of the angle. F = ma = "forwards minus backwards and up minus down" In this case, the weight vector parallel to the slope is the forward, and is being impeded by the backward force of friction (f = uN). You might find it handy to know that whatever the mass of an object, tan(@)= u (u is frictional coefficient, @ is angle of repose, the angle at which something begins sliding) Last edited by Stephen P : 27-01-2005 at 21:53. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stupid physics problem.
Quote:
yep u were right thought about that but was too lazy to check; checked it now and worked. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Stupid physics problem.
heh someone bet me to it ...
The difference is a lot lol.... cos34° = 0.8290375726... Cos34(rads) = -0.8485702748... F is actually Frmax remember... If its in limiting equilibrium, Then the friction is up the slope, and a componant of gravity is down the slope. So along the slope, you get mgsinα=Frmax and at a right angle, you have the reaction vs the other componant of the gravitational force. Thus - mgcosα=R Since Frmax=μR, μ=F/R, so you get mgsinα/mgcosα=μ=tanα Assuming the object is in Limiting Equilibrium . It will not give you the correct value of μ otherwise it will be lower. I've attached a little diagram i did in paint. I am actually studying double maths so i hve done 2 mechanics modules, and doing the final one in a month lol... |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stupid physics problem.
The entier first problem is also completely ignoring the rotational inertia of the pullies and the streching of the rope that would occur.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Stupid physics problem.
Right with the friction. My dynamics professor would always trick the class with that. MAXIMUM friction is Mu*Normal force. ACTUAL friction can be less. Remember that when you solve, because it can make equilibrium seem a little wacky. (I'll catch it when I put in numbers and get two answers for the same variable. Watch vector components that appear in both X and Y directions... You can catch errors with them.)
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Programming Problem: Extremely Frustrating | chantilly_team | Programming | 19 | 12-02-2005 23:00 |
| Physics Problem | Venkatesh | Math and Science | 13 | 30-11-2004 20:30 |
| Funky Physics problem. | Elgin Clock | Math and Science | 4 | 29-09-2004 13:00 |
| The problem with scouting... | archiver | 2001 | 10 | 23-06-2002 23:49 |
| Major problem with chipphua motors | aka Scott White | Motors | 18 | 19-03-2002 19:44 |