Go to Post The urge to compete tends to drive teams to hold the ideas close during the competition season, but the urge to contribute means they get publicized afterwards. - Alan Anderson [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Motors
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-02-2005, 22:29
Projectchon's Avatar
Projectchon Projectchon is offline
Registered User
AKA: William Lei
FRC #1009 (Vainer Robotic)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Canada, Toronto
Posts: 64
Projectchon can only hope to improve
Re: Burning the FP's

Our team was thinking using FP motor too, well two FP motor, with 6:1/7:1, maybe even 8:1.

Don't you think 4:1 is a bit fast?

120/4=30rpm.....(i think 0.3-0.2 rps is good..)...or am i too slow?
__________________
Team 1009

Last edited by Projectchon : 03-02-2005 at 22:32.
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2005, 10:03
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,744
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: Burning the FP's

It may or may not be too late in the season to try it, but I think this would be a good application for the Nothing But Dewalts FP transmission. You get a 47:1 reduction in the tranny, which gives you a peak power RPM of around 255. Plus you should get a lot of torque out of it. Most importantly of all, you can leave in the anti-backdrive pins, so your motor doesn't have to melt trying to hold your arm in place.

Team 57 is going with this setup for a telescoping tower for all these reasons, though we're having troubles getting the parts. The clamshells are on backorder, so we've ended up buying a drill to cannabalize the shell from. then when our backordered shell comes in, we'll have a shiny new drill for regionals.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2005, 11:02
russell's Avatar
russell russell is offline
Registered User
#1430 (WRONG)
Team Role: Electrical
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Anchorage AK
Posts: 402
russell is a name known to allrussell is a name known to allrussell is a name known to allrussell is a name known to allrussell is a name known to allrussell is a name known to all
Re: Burning the FP's

I wish I had read that earlier. I am beginning to worry we will burn ours trying to hold the arm up. Maybe I should put some fans on it.... Probly wont help but whatever.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2005, 11:09
Rocketboy's Avatar
Rocketboy Rocketboy is offline
Programmer at work, Pilot by heart
AKA: Daniel Schoessler
FRC #1317 (Digital Fusion)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Westerville, Ohio
Posts: 67
Rocketboy will become famous soon enough
Send a message via ICQ to Rocketboy Send a message via AIM to Rocketboy
Re: Burning the FP's

FPs we're a big pain is the ASP last year for my team. This year we're using globes alone at a 10:1 reduction (I think - that's NOT my department).
__________________
-- Unofficial Google Advocate --

I soloed my
"Skyhawk" before I even soloed my car!
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2005, 11:47
jrocket567 jrocket567 is offline
Registered User
FRC #0617
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 68
jrocket567 will become famous soon enoughjrocket567 will become famous soon enough
Re: Burning the FP's

gear that devil down... even if it worked with the origional 4:1 reduction, that arm is flying through the air, and when the arm+robot+tetra all runs into a brick wall, thats a lot of intertia waaaaay up in the air... we learned the hard way last year what inertia does to an arm, and what happens when intertia takes over..not a pretty sight.. the tip of our arm, fully extended, will move no faster than 16in/sec..
good luck
j
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2005, 11:58
MattB703 MattB703 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Matt
None #0703 (Team Pheonix)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Saginaw, MI
Posts: 233
MattB703 has much to be proud ofMattB703 has much to be proud ofMattB703 has much to be proud ofMattB703 has much to be proud ofMattB703 has much to be proud ofMattB703 has much to be proud ofMattB703 has much to be proud ofMattB703 has much to be proud ofMattB703 has much to be proud ofMattB703 has much to be proud of
Re: Burning the FP's

Quote:
Originally Posted by russell
I wish I had read that earlier. I am beginning to worry we will burn ours trying to hold the arm up. Maybe I should put some fans on it.... Probly wont help but whatever.
Figure out how to use a spring/surgical tubing/weight to counter the force of gravity on your arm. The arm should ideally be neutrally balanced so the motor has to pull it down into the starting position. That will be your best shot at not burning up the FP motor.
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2005, 12:10
Andy Baker's Avatar Woodie Flowers Award
Andy Baker Andy Baker is offline
President, AndyMark, Inc.
FRC #3940 (CyberTooth)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Kokomo, Indiana
Posts: 3,424
Andy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond reputeAndy Baker has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Andy Baker
Re: Burning the FP's

Yep, you gotta gear that F-P motor down quite a bit to make it useful. We are gearing one of ours down by 894:1, which is 7x the reduction of the F-P gearbox alone.

Andy B.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-02-2005, 22:24
russell's Avatar
russell russell is offline
Registered User
#1430 (WRONG)
Team Role: Electrical
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Anchorage AK
Posts: 402
russell is a name known to allrussell is a name known to allrussell is a name known to allrussell is a name known to allrussell is a name known to allrussell is a name known to all
Re: Burning the FP's

Yeah, right now we are gonna use a two stage sprocket set up to gear it down. First will be about 2:1 second will be 4.5 to one. In addition to the FP gearbox. Thats...... somewhere in the vicinity of 1100:1. Then multiply nine times 40 foot pounds (the supposed torque of the FP motor) and our arm should theoretically have about as much torque as some cars.
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-02-2005, 09:49
Doug G's Avatar
Doug G Doug G is offline
Coach / Teacher
FRC #0701 (Robovikes)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Fairfield, CA
Posts: 880
Doug G has a reputation beyond reputeDoug G has a reputation beyond reputeDoug G has a reputation beyond reputeDoug G has a reputation beyond reputeDoug G has a reputation beyond reputeDoug G has a reputation beyond reputeDoug G has a reputation beyond reputeDoug G has a reputation beyond reputeDoug G has a reputation beyond reputeDoug G has a reputation beyond reputeDoug G has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Burning the FP's

We tried two stock FP Gearboxes with an additional 6:1 reduction (180*6= 1080 total reduction) and it powered our 7 lb, ~4.5 ft arm but drew 30 Amps each when 13 lbs were loaded at the end of the arm. See attached pics #297 & #303.

Not a good scenario for those FP's - design it so they don't have to draw more than 15-20 Amps at full load, otherwise they just might not last. We made a new transmission that has 260:1 reduction (see attached pic #311) and then the additional 6:1 for a total of over 1500:1 reduction. Hopefully this will keep the motors in tip top shape and we still get a couple ft/sec at the end of the arm.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00311_small.JPG
Views:	86
Size:	79.8 KB
ID:	2907  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00303_cropped.JPG
Views:	51
Size:	96.3 KB
ID:	2908  Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC00297cropped.jpg
Views:	45
Size:	73.7 KB
ID:	2909  
__________________
Work Hard, Have Fun, Make a Difference!

Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How slow is too slow? Joe Ross Rules/Strategy 23 12-10-2004 20:23
Programming port burning hot Joe Ross Control System 5 02-03-2004 09:47
FP burning out Max Lobovsky Motors 6 24-02-2004 07:52
PWM and burning out motors patrickrd Technical Discussion 7 19-06-2003 15:30
Burning rumors archiver 1999 5 23-06-2002 21:58


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 15:44.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi