|
|
|
 I think with 1114 & 217 as our partners we could have won with my refrigerator on the field. - JVN [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| I think with 1114 & 217 as our partners we could have won with my refrigerator on the field. - JVN [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
03-02-2005, 23:47
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: camera tracks but no movement from Robot
Without knowing anything about what your autonomous code is supposed to do, I can't really suggest anything helpful. All I have are questions:
Is your autonomous code controlling the same pwm outputs as your driver code? How are you putting the robot into autonomous mode? Are you sure you aren't accidentally disabling the robot when you're activating autonomous? If your program is based on the v2.4 default code, are you using pwm1 and 2 for your drive motors, or pwm11 and 12? The default tracking code puts the commands on pwm11 and 12, the same place used for single-joystick control. If you're using two-joystick "tank" control on the lower pwms, you will have to change the tracking outputs. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is the suggested Vision Camera setup ILLEGAL?! | Mr. Lim | Rules/Strategy | 37 | 20-01-2005 21:46 |
| Is allowing a practice robot good for FIRST? | Matt Adams | General Forum | 38 | 19-01-2005 11:35 |
| CMUCam2 Camera Code - Are important parts commented out? | Mr. Lim | Programming | 4 | 14-01-2005 12:11 |
| Tank tracks vs. Wheels | MBosompra | Technical Discussion | 28 | 16-01-2004 23:31 |
| about how Drive Train push the robot... shouldn't the force accelerate the robot? | Ken Leung | Technical Discussion | 12 | 26-11-2001 09:39 |
Threaded Mode