|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Designing arms against buckling
Rick,
I knew it started with a T, but I always screw the name up (the video will NEVER leave my memory). Every part of my message dealt with buckling, except the last sentence which mentioned dynamic conditions. I should have elaborated on what I meant by dynamic conditions, but I wanted to keep my message short. The point I was trying to make was that when dealing with buckling, mass is not a contributor to the critical load. However, when dealing with dynamic conditions (aka natural frequency, resonant frequency, etc.), mass is a big player. After re-reading the message, I can see how someone would make the buckling connection to the last sent ace. I apologize for the confusion. -Paul |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Designing arms against buckling
Don't forget torsional stress. Allot of load analysis formulas ignore torsional stress because they are analyzing a load bearing beam in 1 or 2 dimensions. The arm will be subjected to torsional stress. We're using a 2" square tube with a 1" tube foamed and epoxied inside to account for these stresses. (fiberglass). Tube in tube can help also butted tubing can help.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need help designing keyway in gear | sanddrag | Technical Discussion | 17 | 31-01-2005 08:43 |
| Truss designs in arms | Max Lobovsky | Technical Discussion | 9 | 27-01-2005 13:30 |
| pneumatic arms | Jesse | Control System | 1 | 06-02-2004 15:41 |
| re designing old mechiniism | Andrew Dahl | Rules/Strategy | 7 | 13-01-2004 19:35 |
| What do you think of team 61 robot | Walter_Jr | Robot Showcase | 69 | 01-04-2003 11:41 |