|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: "Load Bearing Surface"
Erin,
The reason for all this banter is because we read update 13. There are two major camps with regards to the loading zones (robot): Camp #1: Touching was always in the rules, so why are they making it easier for the teams who just ignored/didn't know the rules? Camp #2: It has been unclear from day one as to what constituted in the loading zone. The last Q&A (load bearing surface) didn't come out until Feb 16th, what gives? The latest update allows you to put a tie-wrap hanging down from your robot base to make it legal. What's the point? Let me ask you these questions: 1. Was it that hard to see a robot base over the triangle at the scrimmage? 2. Would putting a tie wrap under the robot base make it easier for you? 3. Would a rule like, "Your robot base should cover at least some part of the loading zone triangle to be considered in the zone", make it easier or harder for a ref? I am curious to hear your feedback. -Paul |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ratchet/slip bearing? | Ianworld | Technical Discussion | 6 | 20-01-2005 13:04 |
| Looking for 1/2" id flanged bearing .25" thick or less (with flange) | Travis Covington | Technical Discussion | 17 | 12-12-2004 21:26 |
| bearing help | jimfortytwo | Technical Discussion | 9 | 01-05-2004 06:20 |
| Need A 0.75" ID bearing .DWG | Tytus Gerrish | Inventor | 6 | 22-10-2003 11:23 |
| Bearing support - Official | Mike Martus | OCCRA | 0 | 24-09-2002 05:26 |