|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Which goal designation do you like most / think is most practical? | |||
| Number 1 |
|
17 | 48.57% |
| Number 2 |
|
3 | 8.57% |
| Number 3 |
|
3 | 8.57% |
| Number 4 |
|
2 | 5.71% |
| Number 5 |
|
5 | 14.29% |
| Number 6 |
|
2 | 5.71% |
| Number 7 |
|
0 | 0% |
| Number 8 |
|
4 | 11.43% |
| Number 9 |
|
2 | 5.71% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: universal goal designations : The poll
Reading over the replies, I decided to vote for number one because of all the variation in how teams are dealing with this.
If we use number 1 (far left, near left, etc.), it will be understandable no matter what system our partners have used previously. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Universal goal location designations | Mr. A | General Forum | 42 | 17-03-2005 01:15 |
| Midfield Collisions | Swampdude | General Forum | 36 | 31-01-2005 23:51 |
| Small balls in 2001 competition | archiver | 2001 | 10 | 24-06-2002 03:59 |
| Curie Division Robots information... (not complete) | archiver | 2001 | 3 | 24-06-2002 03:13 |