Go to Post "There are two ways to compete in this world, you can drag your competitors down, or you can rise above them. Which is better for the world in the long run?" - Karthik [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-02-2005, 23:18
Alex1072 Alex1072 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Alex
#1072 (Harker Robotics Team)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: San Jose
Posts: 110
Alex1072 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to Alex1072 Send a message via Yahoo to Alex1072
Re: "Load Bearing Surface"

I guess what it comes down to for me is that I don't understand what the point of this is. The intent of the rule was to make absolutly sure that noone got too clever and decided to make an arm that would reach in and still be "over" the loading zone. That's why it must be "touching" in my view. I don't think the touching clarifcation was intended to aid judged because, as the judges have stated above, it doesn't. The point was to make sure that your actual robot was in the zone, not an appendage, or some kind of weird borderline case that still creates a safety hazard. So, if they're allowing hanging zipties to count, I don't understand why they don't want to allow the 3 dimensional space interpretation. I don't see how it changes ANYTHING at all other then preventing teams from having to add string and zipties to the front of their drivetrain. Since the "base or drivetrain" part of the rule would be unchanged, it would still ensure that you are over the loading zone with your actual robot. I don't see anyone who such a ruling would harm either, since all it does is let people remove zip ties. How would the current rule be effected if "virtual zipties" were assumed? (other then a couple grams of weight saved)

To the people who say that the touching is required to remove gray areas, I would say that it actually just moves the gray areas to a different place. If hovering is allowed, the gray area is "was this robot far enough in?" If touching is required, the gray area is "was it actually in contact?". At the very least, having a hovering rule would have allowed teams to make it clear by driving farther in. With the "touching" rule, the teams themselves arn't sure if they are "in". I don't see a problem with a judge saying, "you wern't far enough over the loading zone for it to be clear". This is a subjective judgement, but it is a fairly easy one to make. I think touching/not touching would be much harder call to make,

I doubt FIRST will change this ruling at this point though, so I guess we'll just have to deal.
__________________
--------------------------------------
Alex
President
Team 1072 Harker Robotics
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ratchet/slip bearing? Ianworld Technical Discussion 6 20-01-2005 13:04
Looking for 1/2" id flanged bearing .25" thick or less (with flange) Travis Covington Technical Discussion 17 12-12-2004 21:26
bearing help jimfortytwo Technical Discussion 9 01-05-2004 06:20
Need A 0.75" ID bearing .DWG Tytus Gerrish Inventor 6 22-10-2003 11:23
Bearing support - Official Mike Martus OCCRA 0 24-09-2002 05:26


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:39.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi