|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Collaborative Robot Design Project
It sounds like a very interesting idea. I'd be interested in helping out. I already have most of my teams bot designed and I think somethings could be easily migrated to a new design. I know my teams arm is nothing amazing(there are defenitly better designs) but I really like our two speed shifter using the kit gearboxes and our special magic bumpers which are unique and worked well in tests(not in competition because we haven't competed yet
) at making us unstopable. I could defenitly put together a quick presentation and present it to an online group. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Collaborative Robot Design Project
sounds like a great idea, video confrencing for this i believe would be essential, and i do believe all the designers should be in the same time zone that would be pretty helpful also, and the closer you are to each other the better it is. But if you do this you'd need to start soon, because the extra organization will slow you down by at least a week.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Collaborative Robot Design Project
team 1083 was trying to do a project last summer like this with my team,180 and 179... we were going to build a full robot though...we had a few meetings and all...it didn't fully work out..perhaps we can try it again this summer
i hope something works out...such a cool idea to learn stuff from other teams Last edited by tiffany34990 : 09-03-2005 at 21:00. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Collaborative Robot Design Project
The immediate plan is to determine interest. Which means I have to sit on my butt for a few days and see how many would seriously consider doing this. This would primarily be for design, and is unlikely that it will be built, although the everyone bring a small peice idea would keep the cost's down, and prove that designing a robot on the web could work. You're right about video conferencing, and keeping it in the same time zone would simplify things, but I would rather not exclude anyone from this experience.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Collaborative Robot Design Project
I think it would be fun for school FIRST teams, if they have time and a place to meet all year, to build a robot that gets worked on all year, and the same robot gets improved from year to year, added to, programming, new sensors, vision system, speech synthesis, object manipulation....
I dont know what it would do, what its purpose would be or what tasks/functions it would perform, but with the spare parts from a FIRST kit you could really put together something that is well beyond what most highschool 'robotics clubs' are able to accomplish |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Collaborative Robot Design Project
It's definitely a revolutionary idea; the collaboration that our team's had with 22 and 60 is much less extensive than what you have proposed here. Here are some things I learned over the past couple years.
In our collaboration, there are only three teams working together - 22, 60, and 254 - and all of us are in relatively close geographic proximity. It's much easier to communicate when you're geographically close, even with instant communication thru email and phone; it'd be hard for a team to collaborate with someone (or multiple "someones") several time zones away. Also, throughout the build season, all three of our teams got together on multiple occasions to machine parts together, to look at drawings together, and to just hang out. A collaboration isn't just about building robots - it's building relationships with people who you wouldn't normally meet, let alone codesign a 130 lb machine with. Not being able to see your collaboration partners until nats would take something out of that relationship. And you're right, coreyjon, it's already pretty tough to get people to agree on a single design when they're all on the same team - and it's ten times that every time you bring another set of people into the mix. It's no doubt that every new team brings a new set of ideas that could greatly improve the design, every new team also brings its own protocols, its own team dynamics, its own way of doing things. Getting everyone on the same page would be the biggest challenge in a project like this. Even though I'm unsure if we can pull this off before Nats, I still greatly admire your ambition. Innovative, revolutionary, and seemingly impossible ideas like this are the true essence of FIRST. My hat's off to you. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Collaborative Robot Design Project
Team 217 and 229 collaborated this year, and it has turned out awesome. We both have the same shuttle and arm design, and it has worked out great, as you can probally see in this pic.http://www.chiefdelphi.com/pics/bin/11099616438.jpg
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Collaborative Robot Design Project
I'd definitely be interested in this. My thesis is going to be in the New Product Development / Design area. My boss / thesis advisor works with team 578, so I'm sure I can get approval to spend some time working on and evaluating collaborative design efforts.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Collaborative Robot Design Project
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Collaborative Robot Design Project
heres a question for some of the teams that have successfully had a collaborative design, the one variable i've believe there would be in competition is driver and operator skill, did you guys find any other differences, or simularities outside of your robots?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2005 FRC Team Update 14 | Jeffrafa | General Forum | 43 | 01-03-2005 15:52 |
| Best Robot Ever(again) | Corey Balint | General Forum | 26 | 04-08-2004 23:03 |
| How do you design your robot? | Gui Cavalcanti | General Forum | 23 | 16-11-2003 18:33 |
| SPAM Robot design | GateRunner | Rumor Mill | 29 | 19-01-2003 00:34 |
| about how Drive Train push the robot... shouldn't the force accelerate the robot? | Ken Leung | Technical Discussion | 12 | 26-11-2001 09:39 |