|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: YMTC: Defensive Strategies
Quote:
in rapid succession with a multiple attempts at the third as we could still "offensively" move to score, I would like to suggest that if high speed ramming is allowed, that we also be allowed to build and field the perfect energy absorbing bumper. It goes as follows: Have a metal plate outside the wheels, but within the legal footprint. The plate is mounted on shafts that go through bushings in the frame. The shaft contacts the handle end of a 10 pound sledge hammer on a pivot so that when the plate is struck at high speed, the kinetic energy of the impact is converted to kinetic energy in the hammer that slams down vertically on the robot that struck at high speed. The plate is on the side where it could not be employed offensively, and where it would protect the wheels. Any robot that tries to get themselves a wheel, or two, had better be well amored from above. A simple push does not impart any energy to the hammer that is otherwise kept in place with bungies... This really looks like battle bots, but any rational person would say that a robot that is slamming to produce damage is getting their due. Legal? You get really unhappy when a team slams a high speed only for the purpose of breaking wheels off. It has no place in FIRST robotics. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Extent on Defensive Game | Jeff K. | Rules/Strategy | 1 | 18-02-2005 00:21 |
| YMTC: Your Thoughts | Natchez | You Make The Call | 16 | 07-01-2005 02:16 |
| YMTC: Should YMTC have a future | Natchez | You Make The Call | 13 | 21-04-2004 00:46 |
| YMTC: Redabot accidentally breaks goal | Natchez | You Make The Call | 9 | 10-04-2004 12:11 |
| YMTC: Bluabot sits on Redabot | Natchez | You Make The Call | 19 | 08-04-2004 16:43 |