Go to Post Congrats! You are an inspiration to us all! - preussrobotics [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2005, 21:33
slickguy2007 slickguy2007 is offline
Copioli is the man!!!
FRC #1403 (Cougar Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: Skillman, NJ
Posts: 545
slickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to slickguy2007
Re: Regional-specific rules, etc., and do the referees read the rules?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory
But if that ref is a mentor for said team, they'd be needed by the team, and could not volunteer.

That's not true. Our mentor was a ref at the championship event in our division. Every time we came onto the field, he would take a break and let someone else temporarily sub in so it wouldn't be bias. We needed him with us for the trip, and he was with us... just down on the field




GO 1403!!!
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2005, 21:53
nobrakes8 nobrakes8 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Kevin
FRC #4206 (RoboVikes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 150
nobrakes8 has much to be proud ofnobrakes8 has much to be proud ofnobrakes8 has much to be proud ofnobrakes8 has much to be proud ofnobrakes8 has much to be proud ofnobrakes8 has much to be proud ofnobrakes8 has much to be proud ofnobrakes8 has much to be proud ofnobrakes8 has much to be proud ofnobrakes8 has much to be proud of
Re: Regional-specific rules, etc., and do the referees read the rules?

It seems to me most of the problems are out in areas that are fairly new to FIRST (like denver and the west coast). UTC I believe had most of the same refs from 2004 and these guys were really good.

FIRST is like any sport, bad calls will be made.. Who cares? We just have to get over it and move on because no matter how much we complain they won't change a call.

Look at baseball and how many strikes are called balls or balls called strikes. In basketball some fouls are called offenseive when the should be defensive etc.. It's all part of the game.
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-04-2005, 22:08
Justin_302's Avatar
Justin_302 Justin_302 is offline
Justin
AKA: Justin
FRC #0302 (Mechanical Dragons)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Lake Orion
Posts: 119
Justin_302 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Justin_302
Re: Regional-specific rules, etc., and do the referees read the rules?

I was dissapointed at the West Michigan Regional. When you hit a robot in a loading zone, its a 30 point penalty. They are trying to keep the human players safe. When a robot crosses the drivers plane and the drivers get knocked in the head with a tetra, its only a 10 point or even no penalty. On Friday, a robot trying to cap the center/home row on our side breaks the plane and drops a tetra on me, the other driver, and our coach. Our coach had a busted lip, I had a bump on my head, and the other driver had a sore sholder. The opposing alliance got nothing. Not even a warning. Saturday in the final rounds, we were hit yet again. This time the tetra was higher and hurt more. All the opposing alliance got was a 10 point penalty. I guess safety isnt a concern. The 2 robots deserved 30 point penalties and their robots being disabled.
__________________

Team 302
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-04-2005, 00:28
Biff Biff is offline
Registered User
AKA: Tom Cooper
#1227 (Techno Gremlins)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Grand Rapids MI
Posts: 214
Biff is a jewel in the roughBiff is a jewel in the roughBiff is a jewel in the roughBiff is a jewel in the rough
Re: Regional-specific rules, etc., and do the referees read the rules?

We were at the West Michigan Regional, mostly had to play defence as I totally underestimated the real friction losses in our arm motor assemblies. I'm not going into bad calls and aggressive defence...
My main comment is rules on how to play the game don't effect the PHYSICS of putting 8 and 12 pound objects at heights of sometimes over 14 feet on robots with 28" by 38" bases that weigh only 133.4 lbs or less that can travel as fast as 14+ feet per second. It's time for SAFETY NETTING. 302's drive team shouldn't have been hit once by flying tetras mush less twice.
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-04-2005, 00:44
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,812
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: Regional-specific rules, etc., and do the referees read the rules?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nobrakes8
It seems to me most of the problems are out in areas that are fairly new to FIRST (like denver and the west coast).
The west coast is not new to FIRST. We have had teams since 1995, and regionals since 1999.

West coast regionals should, infact be the most consistant of any in the nation. Sacramento, PNW,SVR, and Vegas all had the same core ref crew. All the mentioned regionals also had FIRSTer's with lots of experience reffing in addition to the core that had been to all the others.
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-04-2005, 10:02
Carol's Avatar
Carol Carol is offline
Registered User
FRC #0365 (MOE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 819
Carol has a reputation beyond reputeCarol has a reputation beyond reputeCarol has a reputation beyond reputeCarol has a reputation beyond reputeCarol has a reputation beyond reputeCarol has a reputation beyond reputeCarol has a reputation beyond reputeCarol has a reputation beyond reputeCarol has a reputation beyond reputeCarol has a reputation beyond reputeCarol has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Regional-specific rules, etc., and do the referees read the rules?

At the regionals I've attended, most of the volunteers at regionals are
from a FIRST team at the event, (with the exception of students from the university hosting the regionals). Frankly, where else would you get volunteers? I've ref'ed at several events, and the fact is that most of the refs are directly involved with a team. They have to sign a paper stating that they will be impartial. If they can, they sit out the matches containing their
team. If not, they take themselves out of any judgment calls such as
tipping. The tendency is actually to be harsher on your team than you would
normally.

At the Championship last year they only selected refs who had done at least
one regional. And again, most were associated with a team. But for the most
part they were assigned to divisions other than their home teams. This is
why it's so hard to find volunteers. You want to watch your team but you
are too busy, and you don't get many breaks (although the free food is
good). This year it will be worse as many more refs are needed and I don't know what the selection process was.

And yes, the refs do read the rules, but I challenge anyone to be able to
memorize 20 pages. The head refs had weekly conference calls to discuss the rules and special training. The other refs have training at the start of the event, and do revisit the various calls during lunch breaks. Most have summary sheets that they use as a reference but occasionally have to go back to the whole rule book as a check. But the rules aren't clear cut and judgment calls have to be made, many in a split second. It's harder than it looks.
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-04-2005, 10:57
Justin_302's Avatar
Justin_302 Justin_302 is offline
Justin
AKA: Justin
FRC #0302 (Mechanical Dragons)
Team Role: Driver
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Lake Orion
Posts: 119
Justin_302 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Justin_302
Re: Regional-specific rules, etc., and do the referees read the rules?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff
My main comment is rules on how to play the game don't effect the PHYSICS of putting 8 and 12 pound objects at heights of sometimes over 14 feet on robots with 28" by 38" bases that weigh only 133.4 lbs or less that can travel as fast as 14+ feet per second. It's time for SAFETY NETTING. 302's drive team shouldn't have been hit once by flying tetras mush less twice.
VERY good point. I have a bump on my head because of it. I think that a 30 point penalty for hitting a robot in the loading zone to protect the human player should also apply to the breaking the plane and dropping tetras on drivers heads. I know i will be wearing a helmet next time
__________________

Team 302
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-04-2005, 11:59
DukesAZ DukesAZ is offline
President Brophy Robotics
#0991 (The Dukes)
Team Role: Electrical
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 18
DukesAZ has a spectacular aura aboutDukesAZ has a spectacular aura about
Re: Regional-specific rules, etc., and do the referees read the rules?

I have always been a little bothered by the fact that many refs/inspectors/judges are active members of FIRST teams and in many cases teams that are attending the particular regional that they are volunteering at. On several occasions, I have even seen volunteers throw on a team t-shirt and walk with a team when they win an award! How can you have any faith in their impartiality when you see stuff like that?
__________________
The Dukes

2004 Arizona Imagery Award Winners
2004 Los Angeles Entrepreneurship Award Winners
2005 Arizona Regional Finalists with 987 and 1212
2005 Vegas Finalists with 1425 and 359
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-04-2005, 12:15
AmyPrib's Avatar
AmyPrib AmyPrib is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 688
AmyPrib has a reputation beyond reputeAmyPrib has a reputation beyond reputeAmyPrib has a reputation beyond reputeAmyPrib has a reputation beyond reputeAmyPrib has a reputation beyond reputeAmyPrib has a reputation beyond reputeAmyPrib has a reputation beyond reputeAmyPrib has a reputation beyond reputeAmyPrib has a reputation beyond reputeAmyPrib has a reputation beyond reputeAmyPrib has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Regional-specific rules, etc., and do the referees read the rules?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DukesAZ
I have always been a little bothered by the fact that many refs/inspectors/judges are active members of FIRST teams and in many cases teams that are attending the particular regional that they are volunteering at. On several occasions, I have even seen volunteers throw on a team t-shirt and walk with a team when they win an award! How can you have any faith in their impartiality when you see stuff like that?
Well - you have faith. You expect that those members (usually adult team mentors) exhibit GP, and can step aside when it comes to being partial to their team. In some cases, if they have to ref/inspect/judge their own team, they may be harder on their own team.
As stated, many refs will step aside if their team is competing, or they will simply not be "in charge" of reffing their robot, or they will not enter into discussion about a judgement call on their team.
Inspectors - there's usually more than one inspector, so they will allow another to inspect their teams robot.
Judges - the judges judge different awards, and these people are typically chosen by the planning committee for specific reasons. I would say that there are few cases where judges are directly related to any particular team competing there. And even so, in most cases, the judge will not say anything regarding their team, so as to not have bias. i.e. If a team submits Chairman's at a regional, then that judge won't be in charge of that award, they'll be in charge of another one with a different group of judges. There's enough judges to make those decisions, so you shouldn't expect that one person to have biased the entire juding panel.

You have to trust these people. They're upstanding people - Most dont' even want to be in a position that has conflict of interest, so they will do what they can to remove themselves from it (without having to remove themselves from that volunteer position). It's typical for team members to volunteer at regionals that their team is competing because it makes sense. They are there already, and regionals need the volunteers. While at times there may be conflict of interest, you have to expect that they will avoid the conflict however they can. If they don't, then either we start losing a large number of volunteers, or we have a big issue with biased results.... neither is good, and I don't see either happening.

I had a volunteer shirt on at Boilermaker - because I was on the planning committee and volunteering where I could. I threw on my team shirt after matches and during awards - I see no problem with it, same as I don't see any problem with other volunteers doing it. If you think you see some violation of impartiality, then you could talk to somebody about it, but you better have solid grounds to stand on.
__________________

Co-Chair Boilermaker Regional Planning Committee 2004-2011
2008 St. Louis Regional Finalists and Engineering Inspiration Award
2007 St. Louis Regional Champions - Thanks 1444 & 829! / St. Louis and Boilermaker Quality Award
2006 Boilermaker Chairman's Award
Referee - IRI - 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
2005 Midwest Regional - Semifinalist, Engineering Inspiration Award, and Safety Award / Boilermaker Regional - Judges Award
2004 Midwest Regional Champions - Thanks 269 and 930! / IRI Runner-Up - Thanks to 234 and 447!!!
2004 Championship: Archimedes Finalist - Thanks 716 and 1272!
"We are going to be praised and criticized more than we deserve. We are not to be affected by either." ~ co-worker

Last edited by AmyPrib : 04-04-2005 at 12:22.
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-04-2005, 18:51
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,812
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: Regional-specific rules, etc., and do the referees read the rules?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DukesAZ
I have always been a little bothered by the fact that many refs/inspectors/judges are active members of FIRST teams and in many cases teams that are attending the particular regional that they are volunteering at. On several occasions, I have even seen volunteers throw on a team t-shirt and walk with a team when they win an award! How can you have any faith in their impartiality when you see stuff like that?
There's nothing wrong with that. What kind of bias can a field attendant have? Or a Queing volunteer?

I can see your concern with regards to referees, but I don't agree with it. I'd say that in excess of 99% of the time, a referee at their own team's event does not hold any bias towards them.

As Amy said, you just have to trust people.

I refereed two events at which my former team was competing, and not once was there a conflict of interests. If there were to be a difficult call involving them, I would gladly stay out of any discussion between referees to avoid influencing anyone else, or even myself.
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 04-04-2005, 20:22
Unsung FIRST Hero
Al Skierkiewicz Al Skierkiewicz is offline
Broadcast Eng/Chief Robot Inspector
AKA: Big Al WFFA 2005
FRC #0111 (WildStang)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Wheeling, IL
Posts: 10,792
Al Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond reputeAl Skierkiewicz has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Regional-specific rules, etc., and do the referees read the rules?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard
I agree. I'm a technical mentor and an event volunteer...
And I will be inspecting robots again at the Championship, where I hope to see many other team mentors who have time to volunteer.
I also am attached to a team, 111, and performed as lead inspector at Boilermaker and Midwest and will also be at Nationals. I will not inspect my own team, but always leave that to another inspector. As lead inspector, I interact with the field judges and IFI personel to make sure that all participants have a great time and run everytime they go out. I will also work with teams to make sure they are ready to compete, not just inspected but really able to compete. If you come to play, it is my duty to help you play whether I am an inspector or not.
One thing I do is let every team know that I am a Wildstang mentor before I start inspection. I give that team an oportunity to ask for a different inspector if they feel intimidated by my team affiliation. And yes, you will see me wear team colors on Saturday, and I will cheer for my team's alliance. You will get a full, unbiased decision on your robot modifications and weight and size when needed regardless of the color of the shirt I am wearing and regardless of your qualifying position, your action on or off the field, or your latest interaction with my team's robot. You will get all of these things because I am committed to gracious professionalism and the desire to see that every team has a fair chance to compete on a level playing field.


And just so everyone knows, Wildstang team shirts are ALL colors and I take that to mean we are on ALL teams. If you need help, look for a tie dye shirt.
__________________
Good Luck All. Learn something new, everyday!
Al
WB9UVJ
www.wildstang.org
________________________
Storming the Tower since 1996.
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-04-2005, 22:55
Eric301 Eric301 is offline
Dearborn High School P.R.O.B.O.T.S
AKA: Eric Strickland
#0301 (P.R.O.B.O.T.S.)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3
Eric301 will become famous soon enoughEric301 will become famous soon enough
Re: Regional-specific rules, etc., and do the referees read the rules?

Our team has competed in both Detroit and Palmetto. We found that these 2 regionals were very different. We felt that the refs in Detroit called the rules very fairly and very closely to the way they were written. When there was a question, the head ref explained the ruling to our all student drive team.

Unfortunately, Palmetto was much different. In Palmetto during the driver meeting, the head ref stressed that any robot that either broke the plane of the driver station or approached the driver station with an elevated tetra that could fly over the Plexiglas, would be shut off in the name of safety. We were amazed when we witnessed 3 different tetras fly over the Plexiglas with no penalties or disablement. During the semi-finals, a robot arm extended around the end of the player station and came within inches of our arm operator, still no penalty or disablement.

We witnessed human elements jumping off the floor in order to hang a tetra on a robot in Palmetto with no penalty. We got penalized in Detroit because our human element stood on his tip-toes.

In the final match that determined the Palmetto champion, one of our alliance partners (the number 1 seed) was pulled over by an opponent. There was no penalty. In Detroit, we were told that tipping over other robots would not be tolerated.

In Palmetto, our arm was ripped from our robot as we attempted to cap the center goal. The offending robot did not have a tetra, was not attempting to stack, and chose to attach our robot's arm 10ft in the air instead of blocking the goal. In Detroit, we were told that we would be penalized for using an arm to attack a robot high in the air. Fortunately, we were able to make a new arm segment and re-assemble our robot in time for the next match.

In qualifying match number 56 in Palmetto, it was ruled that a tetra was being supported by another tetra that was hanging above it. I guess gravity points upward in Palmetto. That ruling cost us the tetra, a row, and the match. I will include a picture of the "unseated" tetra.

In each of these cases, the head ref refused to speak to our student drive coach and would only address an adult. Our 18 year old drive coach and senior was highly offended. In her 4 years with First, she had never been treated that way.

This is my 3rd year as a mentor. I have been extremely surprised at how well matches have been ref'ed in the past. I think First has failed this year in 2 ways. #1 The refs have not been trained in a way that would lead to calls that are consistent to each other or to the rule book. #2 This game has so many different elements and rules, that it is very difficult to call. There are 6 robots going to 8 loading stations and 9 goals and there are 6 human elements. There is a lot going on. In the end, the refs may be forced to make scoring calls on each of the 9 goals and remember how many tetras of each color slinkied off of one of the goals.

Even with our second place finish in Palmetto and the warm weather, our team unanimously decided not to return to Palmetto next year.

Oh yeah, please take a look at the attached picture of the tetra that was judged to be not fully seated.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	This tetra is not stacked.jpg
Views:	62
Size:	77.5 KB
ID:	3245  
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-04-2005, 00:17
The Lucas's Avatar
The Lucas The Lucas is offline
CaMOElot, it is a silly place
AKA: My First Name is really "The" (or Brian)
FRC #0365 (The Miracle Workerz); FRC#1495 (AGR); FRC#4342 (Demon)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Dela-Where?
Posts: 1,564
The Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond reputeThe Lucas has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to The Lucas
Re: Regional-specific rules, etc., and do the referees read the rules?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DukesAZ
I have always been a little bothered by the fact that many refs/inspectors/judges are active members of FIRST teams and in many cases teams that are attending the particular regional that they are volunteering at. On several occasions, I have even seen volunteers throw on a team t-shirt and walk with a team when they win an award! How can you have any faith in their impartiality when you see stuff like that?
There is nothing wrong with volunteers being open about their team affiliation or receiving an award that they worked hard for as a member of that team. Wouldn't it be worse if they tried to keep their team affiliation a secret?

At Philly, all refs/inspectors/judges signed a conflict of interest form (quoted below), with rules about behavior toward their team. I don’t know if other regionals are using this form, but it is a good idea to set up the guidelines up front.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Conflict of Interest and Disclosure Statement
By signing this document, I, the undersigned agree to disclose any direct relationship I may have with a FIRST Robotics Team. I also agree, if I do have a relationship with a competing FIRST Robotics Team, to disqualify myself from any discussions, judging, inspecting or refereeing in which involve my team.
In the Inspection position: I will disclose to the Lead Robot Inspector any direct affiliation with a FIRST Robotics Team and I will not inspect or attempt to influence any other inspector in the inspection of my team’s robot.
In the Refereeing position: I will disclose to the Head Referee any direct affiliation with a FIRST Robotics Team and I will not involve myself in the refereeing decisions regarding my team.
In the Field Supervisor position: I will disclose to the Field Manager and/or Head Referee any direct affiliation with a FIRST Robotics Team and I will not attempt to influence robot inspectors, referees or judges or involve myself in any conversations regarding my team.
In the Judging position: I will disclose to the Judge Advisor any direct affiliation with a FIRST Robotics Team and will not participate in any discussions or award decisions regarding this team or otherwise attempt to influence decisions relating to awards my team might be considered for.
This is the first year I have seen this form, but FIRST has always known which teams the volunteers were from. The volunteer application form asks you for FIRST team experience, mostly to make sure you are qualified for your position.

I've been a member of 365 for 5 years and a robot inspector for 3. While I’m inspecting, it is pretty easy to tell that I’m a MOE member. In 2003 and 2004, I had permanent MOE Green hair for all the competitions . There was a shortage of volunteers this year at Pitt, so I was asked to help out with the inspections Thursday night. I didn’t get a crew shirt or badge, so I inspected two robots in my MOE shirt. It was a little awkward when I had to explain the situation to both teams, but the inspections went off w/o a hitch.
__________________
Electrical & Programming Mentor ---Team #365 "The Miracle Workerz"
Programming Mentor ---Team #4342 "Demon Robotics"
Founding Mentor --- Team #1495 Avon Grove High School
2007 CMP Chairman's Award - Thanks to all MOE members (and others) past and present who made it a reality.
Robot Inspector
"I don't think I'm ever more ''aware'' than I am right after I burn my thumb with a soldering iron"

Last edited by The Lucas : 06-04-2005 at 00:22.
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-04-2005, 00:42
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,812
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: Regional-specific rules, etc., and do the referees read the rules?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric301
Our team has competed in both Detroit and Palmetto. We found that these 2 regionals were very different. We felt that the refs in Detroit called the rules very fairly and very closely to the way they were written. When there was a question, the head ref explained the ruling to our all student drive team.

Unfortunately, Palmetto was much different. In Palmetto during the driver meeting, the head ref stressed that any robot that either broke the plane of the driver station or approached the driver station with an elevated tetra that could fly over the Plexiglas, would be shut off in the name of safety. We were amazed when we witnessed 3 different tetras fly over the Plexiglas with no penalties or disablement. During the semi-finals, a robot arm extended around the end of the player station and came within inches of our arm operator, still no penalty or disablement.

We witnessed human elements jumping off the floor in order to hang a tetra on a robot in Palmetto with no penalty. We got penalized in Detroit because our human element stood on his tip-toes.

In the final match that determined the Palmetto champion, one of our alliance partners (the number 1 seed) was pulled over by an opponent. There was no penalty. In Detroit, we were told that tipping over other robots would not be tolerated.

In Palmetto, our arm was ripped from our robot as we attempted to cap the center goal. The offending robot did not have a tetra, was not attempting to stack, and chose to attach our robot's arm 10ft in the air instead of blocking the goal. In Detroit, we were told that we would be penalized for using an arm to attack a robot high in the air. Fortunately, we were able to make a new arm segment and re-assemble our robot in time for the next match.

In qualifying match number 56 in Palmetto, it was ruled that a tetra was being supported by another tetra that was hanging above it. I guess gravity points upward in Palmetto. That ruling cost us the tetra, a row, and the match. I will include a picture of the "unseated" tetra.

In each of these cases, the head ref refused to speak to our student drive coach and would only address an adult. Our 18 year old drive coach and senior was highly offended. In her 4 years with First, she had never been treated that way.

This is my 3rd year as a mentor. I have been extremely surprised at how well matches have been ref'ed in the past. I think First has failed this year in 2 ways. #1 The refs have not been trained in a way that would lead to calls that are consistent to each other or to the rule book. #2 This game has so many different elements and rules, that it is very difficult to call. There are 6 robots going to 8 loading stations and 9 goals and there are 6 human elements. There is a lot going on. In the end, the refs may be forced to make scoring calls on each of the 9 goals and remember how many tetras of each color slinkied off of one of the goals.

Even with our second place finish in Palmetto and the warm weather, our team unanimously decided not to return to Palmetto next year.

Oh yeah, please take a look at the attached picture of the tetra that was judged to be not fully seated.
I'm guessing the robot that is holding the tetra that's touching the stacked one is a blue bot. If so, that's why you lost the points.
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 06-04-2005, 01:03
Stu Bloom's Avatar
Stu Bloom Stu Bloom is offline
I REALLY want to be Andy Baker
FRC #1018 (RoboDevils)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 662
Stu Bloom has a reputation beyond reputeStu Bloom has a reputation beyond reputeStu Bloom has a reputation beyond reputeStu Bloom has a reputation beyond reputeStu Bloom has a reputation beyond reputeStu Bloom has a reputation beyond reputeStu Bloom has a reputation beyond reputeStu Bloom has a reputation beyond reputeStu Bloom has a reputation beyond reputeStu Bloom has a reputation beyond reputeStu Bloom has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Stu Bloom Send a message via Yahoo to Stu Bloom
Re: Regional-specific rules, etc., and do the referees read the rules?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cory
I'm guessing the robot that is holding the tetra that's touching the stacked one is a blue bot. If so, that's why you lost the points.
That does not matter in this case. For the purposes of "robot touching a tetra" for scoring count (especially in the home zone when robots are returning at the end of a match) a tetra in the grasp of a robot IS NOT considered to be part of the robot. The indicated tetra should have been scored for BLUE.

As a referee for the past few years (including championship last year, GLR and championship this year) I am quite disturbed by the number of reports of inconsistent calls and apparently "made-up" rules at various regionals this year. I am sure that the referees at these events, as well as all other volunteers, share my committment to performing our jobs to the best of our abilities. I can only hope that many of these reports are the result of a mis-communication or a mis-understanding of the call/explanation.

I know for a fact that these forums are watched closely for feedback, and many of these issues have been discussed during the regular head referee communications that occur throughout the season. While I am not a head referee (yet) I will raise these concerns at the referee training sessions and do my best to assure that the rules are applied as consistently as possible at the championship event.

Good luck to all teams competing ... I am sure the Championship will be GREAT this year (as always) ... and I can't wait!!
__________________
Stuart Bloom
Mechanical Engineer
Rolls-Royce Corporation
FIRST Team 1018 - Pike HS RoboDevils
My activity for 2012:
  • Boilermaker planning committee
  • Israel Head Ref - DONE (and it was FANTASTIC!)
  • Boilermaker Regional (with 1018) - DONE
  • Midwest Head Ref - DONE
  • WORLD Championships (with 1018) - DONE
  • IRI Head Ref - DONE
  • CAGE Match Head Ref
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 18:01.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi