REWARD OFFERED: A CAPPED VISION TETRA ON THE CENTER FIELD GOAL

[Elgin Clock]

Originally Posted by tkwetzel

Vision capping hopefuls for nationals (let me know if I miss any):

Where to look for the potentials...

66 Curie
237 Galileo
281 Galileo
386 Archimedes
624 Archimedes
980 Archimedes


Hmm.. No one from Newton wants to try?

[Beta Version]

WOW, so confused I have no idea what that last post meant at all.

[ben281]

hey everyone!
i really have to agree with beta version. the 3 goal cap in autonomous is an amazing advantage! most teams can't cap 3 in one match little alone in autonomous. also the triangle formation is a great starting place for strategy! think about it, what would the opponents do for starting strategy? its a real conumdrum for them. it is almost an automatic back row for the team who does it and the other two teams on the alliance will already be attacking their back row, before they can get it. i think you will be hard pressed to find a game where a team that does it in autonomous will lose that game. even with unfair team match ups. but hey! its only in a few weeks away! we will see very soon! good luck to everyone at nats. and can't wait to match up with you 237! we are in the same section! catch everyone later
Ben
TEAM 281!!

[Mike Soukup]

Originally Posted by Elgin Clock

Hmm.. No one from Newton wants to try?

I wouldn't make that assumption. Maybe it's just that no one from Newton is brave (or is it foolish?) enough to guarantee a center goal cap in autonomous like so many others have.

[Beta Version]

Originally Posted by Mike Soukup

I wouldn't make that assumption. Maybe it's just that no one from Newton is brave (or is it foolish?) enough to guarantee a center goal cap in autonomous like so many others have.

It's not that were necessarily boasting a guarantee for an autonomous cap from our team (as that would be foolish.) We are simply very proud of the intense work we have done, and are excited at the possibility of seeing this work result in an unprecedented achievement, not just for our own team but for any of the teams, on that list or not, that have stood up to the challenge and strived to accomplish it. Any team that has endeavored to possibly complete this task should be proud of that. No one should feel that if they say they might have the possibility of achieving this that they have made a commitment or grantee to it, nor feel like they will be scrutinized if they fail to succeed. It is not a matter of bravery, but of pride.


I hope no one sees this as a cut against Mike Soukup's opinions, it is simply a statement of my own.