Go to Post if your robot weighs 1-1/2 tons, you have bigger problems then the legality of that jack... - ekapalka [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: What should the role of the human player be in future years?
The role of the human player should be expanded. 25 29.76%
The role of the human player should remain about the same as this year. 48 57.14%
The role of the human player should be more limited (see Stack Attack, 2002). 9 10.71%
There should be no human player element in future years. 2 2.38%
Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-04-2005, 16:07
Justin's Avatar
Justin Justin is offline
Never Forget FIRST 1992-2000
no team
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 288
Justin has a brilliant futureJustin has a brilliant futureJustin has a brilliant futureJustin has a brilliant futureJustin has a brilliant futureJustin has a brilliant futureJustin has a brilliant futureJustin has a brilliant futureJustin has a brilliant futureJustin has a brilliant futureJustin has a brilliant future
Send a message via AIM to Justin
Re: Human Player: Past, Present and Future

Quote:
The role of the human player should be more limited (see Stack Attack, 2002).
Okay I voted for that option but I should mention that that really wasn't a limited human player. If you think the human player was limited in 2003...then you should try 1996 on for size...they were seat belted in to their station and had to throw the ball over a 4' high PVC structure in order to return it to the field. Frankly I've always been against the human player. This used to be around robots once upon a time folks!! It used to be that your robot couldn't be considered a quality robot unless it could actually perform it's functions on the field. There was a time way back when you couldn't win an award for your autonomous program if it didn't work. One of the reasons for the human player was to get more athletes involved in FIRST...someone provide me with actual evidence it has accomplished that goal. What has the addition of the human player done? Like it or not it started us down the slippery slope that lead to the significantly diminished role of the robot, engineering, design, and quality (both of the robot's construction and play on the field) in FIRST that we now have. It seems today that as long as you have a good plan and robot on paper that is what is most important...never mind whether the robot ever plays in a single match. As long as you have a good business plan you are set, who cares if that business makes any money right??
__________________
Rookie Year: 1996 (Hexagon Havoc)
Robots: Hexcalibur (96), Blue Dragon (97), El-e-Vador (98), Astrobot 2000 (99), Last Chance (2000)
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canadian Segway Driver Fined $8000 ahecht Dean Kamen's Inventions 11 21-10-2004 14:24
Attention All Present and Future Purdue Attendees archiver 1999 4 23-06-2002 22:39


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 20:30.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi