|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
hey guys, the 123-7 match was with 447, 1596, and 121. It was a great way to start the day!
Anyhow, I can only comment on galileo teams because they are the only ones I saw. I was truly shocked that 538 and 237 did not get picked. There are many other teams that were "on the cusp" that certainly deserved a shot at the elims (such as 88 and others). I wonder how far the the "all-snub" alliance would have gotten in the elims... I think FIRST needs to somehow allow teams more time to compile scouting data and have some break between the last match and when they call the alliance acptains out to the field. This would help eliminate many problems. Good luck to all, Rob Zeuge |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Official 2005 Game Design] Radical Tournament Ideas | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 42 | 26-04-2005 19:19 |
| Teams that shouldve been picked in hindsight | Corey Balint | General Forum | 4 | 26-04-2004 22:16 |
| 2004 Championship Eligibility Criteria!!! | dez250 | General Forum | 214 | 28-12-2003 20:11 |
| Hits, Misses, & Suggestions -- long message | archiver | 2000 | 17 | 23-06-2002 23:36 |