|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 3 Teams Per Side Too Many?
3 vs 3 = good
-More rounds -More teams -You get field time with almost everyone -Broken robots result in 2 vs 3, which isn't the end of the world -Scouting is different, not harder. (You need to be more creative, and data driven - at least it worked for us.) -More exciting, IMHO, than 2x2 (but that's not a good reason for or against) 3vs3, 2vs2vs2, or 2vs3 would all be fun. (2 vs 3... with an uneven field... and you get equal number of matches on 2 as you get on 3. That would be wild.) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/2005 FRC Game Design Communication to FRC Teams | Goobergunch | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 1 | 06-01-2005 09:29 |
| Robot Collaboration | Karthik | General Forum | 153 | 18-02-2004 03:40 |
| "Fixing" matches | Shawn60 | General Forum | 158 | 18-03-2003 18:41 |
| Long post - this year's game was tough - here's why: | archiver | 2001 | 7 | 24-06-2002 03:31 |