|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 3 Teams Per Side Too Many?
I think the 3 on 3 in fine and a very good thing for FIRST. FIRST is becoming very huge and the 3 on 3 allows more matches per team. For example, if this years game were to have 2 on 2 then we would have had something like 4-5 matches total. I don't know about anybody else but thats kind of boring. It is also for the rookie teams that are not able to go to the Championship. It allows them to have more machetes and therefore more fun or a better chance at winning and going to the Champs. And, like other people said, it makes for more interesting strategies and scouting.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/2005 FRC Game Design Communication to FRC Teams | Goobergunch | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 1 | 06-01-2005 09:29 |
| Robot Collaboration | Karthik | General Forum | 153 | 18-02-2004 03:40 |
| "Fixing" matches | Shawn60 | General Forum | 158 | 18-03-2003 18:41 |
| Long post - this year's game was tough - here's why: | archiver | 2001 | 7 | 24-06-2002 03:31 |