|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Favorite Teams that did not get picked
Yeah, that third team in the 123:7 match was 121. I agree with Rob, it was an amazing way to start the day.
Interesting bit of info: 237 was actually at the top of the list for the 47-121 alliance to pick in the second round, but due to a mixup in the communication channels, they weren't. Oh well. ![]() <soapbox> We all have to remember that the point of FIRST isn't the game... it's what we learn from the game. What did you learn? I learned that sometimes you get hit in the back of the head (by a curveball, no less!) and you just have to deal with it, move on, and do the best that you can. To heck with the game... I now know what Lexan and Delrin and snaprings and PWMs are! Without FIRST, I never would've learned that. ![]() </soapbox> Dave ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [Official 2005 Game Design] Radical Tournament Ideas | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 42 | 26-04-2005 19:19 |
| Teams that shouldve been picked in hindsight | Corey Balint | General Forum | 4 | 26-04-2004 22:16 |
| 2004 Championship Eligibility Criteria!!! | dez250 | General Forum | 214 | 28-12-2003 20:11 |
| Hits, Misses, & Suggestions -- long message | archiver | 2000 | 17 | 23-06-2002 23:36 |