|
|
|
 You don't always get what you pay for, but you hardly ever get what you don't pay for. - MrForbes [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| You don't always get what you pay for, but you hardly ever get what you don't pay for. - MrForbes [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#41
28-04-2005, 13:03
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3 Teams Per Side Too Many?
I enjoyed the 3 vs. 3 challenge this year. What will probably happen though, it will depend on what kind of a challenge First keeps coming out with each year. But, as others have said before, if the number of teams keeps growing, then you will keep seeing the field and the number of alliance partners on at one time, increasing.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/2005 FRC Game Design Communication to FRC Teams | Goobergunch | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 1 | 06-01-2005 09:29 |
| Robot Collaboration | Karthik | General Forum | 153 | 18-02-2004 03:40 |
| "Fixing" matches | Shawn60 | General Forum | 158 | 18-03-2003 18:41 |
| Long post - this year's game was tough - here's why: | archiver | 2001 | 7 | 24-06-2002 03:31 |
Threaded Mode