|
|
|
So... the question is this:
Does Grady keep his stuffed animals on his Barbie House for playtime, or in his bed to help him go sleepy-pie at night-night time? - Andy Baker [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#46
04-05-2005, 10:04
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 3 Teams Per Side Too Many?
I personally liked the 3v3 it helped the events move quicker and allowed teams more matches. With the size and lay out of this years field 3v3 was great, but with past fields platforms, and ramps it would have been too crowed. Also from the game stand point 3v3 made it more more exciting 2v2 would have been a little boring, and the score would have been lower. I also like that the three teams on the tournament alliances could all be playing at once and not have one team sitting out. Also it gave the drive teams more options on the field as a result there was a lot more interesting game play.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/2005 FRC Game Design Communication to FRC Teams | Goobergunch | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 1 | 06-01-2005 09:29 |
| Robot Collaboration | Karthik | General Forum | 153 | 18-02-2004 03:40 |
| "Fixing" matches | Shawn60 | General Forum | 158 | 18-03-2003 18:41 |
| Long post - this year's game was tough - here's why: | archiver | 2001 | 7 | 24-06-2002 03:31 |
Threaded Mode