Go to Post If that due diligence shows that a real need for action exists, *then* grab the pitchforks, and light the torches. - gblake [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > FRC Game Design
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 10:56
Justin Montois's Avatar
Justin Montois Justin Montois is offline
FirstUpdatesNow.com
FRC #3015 (Ranger Robotics)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,347
Justin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond reputeJustin Montois has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Justin Montois
Post FIRST Wish List

Looking at Koko Ed's Lessons learned 2005: The negative, with over 138 replies there must be some changes that we would like to see in FIRST.

I'll start with the way that the eliminations rounds are done at nationals. I think that for the money that teams spend to go there not always getting their moneys worth. I think it would be a great idea to get more teams involved in the elimination rounds. This is how (Copyright Rees 2006)

Have each division have its own "sweet sixteen". Sixteen alliances out of 85 teams. You have more teams getting picked. playing at least 2 more matches and your only adding 1 round of play. Then have the division champs go at it on Einstein.

Also not a bad idea to start rotating through all fields again.

Feel free to comment on other peoples posts as long as you add your own wish as well.
__________________
@jmontois340

Team 3015
2016- World Championship Finalists and Tesla Division Champions with 2056, 1690 and 1405
2016- Greater Pittsburgh Regional Chairman's Award
2016- Pittsburgh Regional Finalists with 1023 and 4050
2015- Newton Division Finalists With 195 and 1756
2015- Finger Lakes Regional Champions with 4039 and 378
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 12:03
Jack Jones Jack Jones is offline
Retired
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Waterford, MI
Posts: 964
Jack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond reputeJack Jones has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Wish List

If they keep three team alliances, then I'd like to see them do away with allowing a seeded team select another. The reason is, with the luck of the draw, some rather weak robots get paired all through the quals with a very good pair and end up much higher than they would have with two team alliances. So, when #1 picks #2, #3 picks #4, etc., they end up in the top eight. The result, as I've seen at four reigionals, was that more than a couple of alliances had little or no chance. It's hard to compete without a strong captain. Having the top eight seeds as captains would make for a much less predictable outcome.
__________________
This message is hidden because Jack Jones is on your ignore list.
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 12:09
Ian Curtis Ian Curtis is offline
Best Available Data
FRC #1778 (Chill Out!)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 2,521
Ian Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Wish List

I personally like the way battlecry seeds are set up. There are 14 alliances and the number 1 and 2 alliances get to sit out for the first round.
I think the number one alliance should be able to pick the number 2 player. FIRST and life are not always fair. Number one should be able to pick who they want and most likely who they want did very well.
__________________
CHILL OUT! | Aero Stability & Control Engineer
Adam Savage's Obsessions (TED Talk) (Part 2)
It is much easier to call someone else a genius than admit to yourself that you are lazy. - Dave Gingery
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 12:22
rufu5's Avatar
rufu5 rufu5 is offline
20something
FRC #6721 (Trailblazer Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Indiana
Posts: 177
rufu5 has much to be proud ofrufu5 has much to be proud ofrufu5 has much to be proud ofrufu5 has much to be proud ofrufu5 has much to be proud ofrufu5 has much to be proud ofrufu5 has much to be proud ofrufu5 has much to be proud ofrufu5 has much to be proud of
Send a message via AIM to rufu5
Re: FIRST Wish List

I really like the idea of a sweet sixteen, but I really disagree with the idea that top 8 teams cant pick among themselves. Just for example: at the Midwest regional last year, we were the 8th seed, knocked off the #1 seed and got runner up: at VCU this year we were 8th seed, got runner up: and in Galileo this year at nationals, we were the 8th seed beat the #1 seed and got runner up. What makes FIRST so great is that it is like a real sport, were you can have those "Cinderella stories" of the unexpected 8th seed fighting its way to the top.

An innovative strategy based off of good scouting beats a #1 alliance any day

More to the point of the tread, I would like to see the camera brought back with auto mode point scoring that forces you to utilize this technology. Hopefully we can get a little more user friendly camera though

447
__________________
have no fear of perfection, you will never reach it.
-Salvador Dali

Last edited by rufu5 : 08-05-2005 at 12:24.
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 12:49
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,634
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: FIRST Wish List

I think the eliminations system is probably as good as it can get. If you double the number of alliances it will do several things.
A)the alliance selection will take longer
B)it will delude the quality of each alliance and therefore the quality of the matches
C)it will make the elimination rounds take longer, therefore less qualifying rounds
D)It'll make the higher seeded alliances even more dominant, as they are the only ones with a real hope of getting two top notch teams (even if they cant pick out of the top 8 or 16)

And we need to keep the ability for a top 8 seed to pick other top 8 seeds. Otherwise your gonna see teams start to "throw matches" to get out of the top 8 so they can be picked by the #1 or #2 teams. And even if you keep the picking amognst the top 8, at championships its not that big of a deal. In Archimedes only 1 team of the top 8 was selected by a higher seed (#8 217 was picked by 245). #9 173 was also picked, but they declined and became the #8 alliance captain.

What I would change is to make the use of the camera during auto even more important. This year it was a great way to score, but it was so difficult not many teams attempted it, and even fewer succeeded. If they had made it worth even MORE points (such as permantly owning the goal it was capped on, or being able to add a free tetra anywhere you wanted at the end of the match) more teams would have attempted it, and more teams would have put more effort into it.
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.

Last edited by Lil' Lavery : 08-05-2005 at 12:51.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 13:41
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,812
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: FIRST Wish List

Quote:
Originally Posted by 340x4xLife
Have each division have its own "sweet sixteen". Sixteen alliances out of 85 teams. You have more teams getting picked. playing at least 2 more matches and your only adding 1 round of play. Then have the division champs go at it on Einstein.
The event is hard enough to keep on schedule as it is. Adding a significantly larger number of matches makes it that much harder, and we'd be there all night Saturday.

At any rate, I'd rather see more seeding matches than more teams in the finals. Then the teams that should be in the top 8 will seed there, not the ones that get there by luck.

This would be impossible to implement at regionals, and therefore should not occur at nationals. You can't have major game changes between the two.
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 14:08
Kyle's Avatar
Kyle Kyle is offline
Mike Wade, RIP You will be missed
AKA: Kyle Rice
FRC #0365 (MOE)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Wilmington, Delaware
Posts: 1,387
Kyle has a reputation beyond reputeKyle has a reputation beyond reputeKyle has a reputation beyond reputeKyle has a reputation beyond reputeKyle has a reputation beyond reputeKyle has a reputation beyond reputeKyle has a reputation beyond reputeKyle has a reputation beyond reputeKyle has a reputation beyond reputeKyle has a reputation beyond reputeKyle has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kyle
Re: FIRST Wish List

I would like to see auto mode go longer then 15 seconds and a game with more ways to score, it gives teams the chance to make different types of bots instead of just capers or box bots.
__________________
2007 Championship Chairmans!!!!! 8 years in the making GO MOE!


Facebook
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 14:22
Billfred's Avatar
Billfred Billfred is offline
...and you can't! teach! that!
FRC #5402 (Iron Kings); no team (AndyMark)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: The Land of the Kokomese, IN
Posts: 8,547
Billfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond reputeBillfred has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Wish List

I've said it before, I'll say it again: a game scored in real-time, as opposed to once the field comes to rest. The technology is out there, and it means you'll have N robots out there looking to deliver their payloads fast and often, putting an emphasis on reliability.

Additionally, I'd like to see FIRST matches upped to three minutes next season. It'll decrease matches, yes, but not as much as one might think (as you've got fewer inter-match periods for field reset, introductions, load-in/out, etc.) And after this season's mad hustle (and anyone who was on a drive team knows what I'm talking about), I think it'll do a world of good.
__________________
William "Billfred" Leverette - Gamecock/Jessica Boucher victim/Marketing & Sales Specialist at AndyMark

2004-2006: FRC 1293 (D5 Robotics) - Student, Mentor, Coach
2007-2009: FRC 1618 (Capital Robotics) - Mentor, Coach
2009-2013: FRC 2815 (Los Pollos Locos) - Mentor, Coach - Palmetto '09, Peachtree '11, Palmetto '11, Palmetto '12
2010: FRC 1398 (Keenan Robo-Raiders) - Mentor - Palmetto '10
2014-2016: FRC 4901 (Garnet Squadron) - Co-Founder and Head Bot Coach - Orlando '14, SCRIW '16
2017-: FRC 5402 (Iron Kings) - Mentor

94 events (more than will fit in a ChiefDelphi signature), 14 seasons, over 61,000 miles, and still on a mission from Bob.

Rule #1: Do not die. Rule #2: Be respectful. Rule #3: Be safe. Rule #4: Follow the handbook.
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 14:24
BandChick's Avatar
BandChick BandChick is offline
Superpower: Knows Everyone
AKA: Sara Reffler
FRC #1089 (Team Mercury)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Hightstown, NJ
Posts: 1,859
BandChick has a reputation beyond reputeBandChick has a reputation beyond reputeBandChick has a reputation beyond reputeBandChick has a reputation beyond reputeBandChick has a reputation beyond reputeBandChick has a reputation beyond reputeBandChick has a reputation beyond reputeBandChick has a reputation beyond reputeBandChick has a reputation beyond reputeBandChick has a reputation beyond reputeBandChick has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to BandChick
Re: FIRST Wish List

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle
I would like to see auto mode go longer then 15 seconds and a game with more ways to score, it gives teams the chance to make different types of bots instead of just capers or box bots.
I'm with Kyle, this game was pretty much two defined ways to score. And scoring underneath goals was not really a game determinant. It wasn't exactly an outstanding quality either. I know when it came to scouting the teams that couldn't cap were pretty much ruled out right off the bad.

In a sense, last year's game was better. You could focus on the bar in the center, the 2x ball or the human player. Why did FIRST decide to change that this year?

I think that alliances should stay the way they are. 8 teams is a pretty good number, especially for the championship event. It's incredibly hard to stay on schedule with any more than that. And picking within the top 8 is good, sometimes. I have been to off-seasons that let you and off-seasons that don't. Usually you get the "super" alliances (like 56, 103, and 25 at PARC yesterday), and then the 8th seed is the "leftovers." But at nationals, that doesn't really happen. There are usually at LEAST 24 competitive teams to pick from. So it works out. Either way, it makes for great stories when the 8th seed can beat the #1 seed (like 447 did to us in Galileo this year).
__________________


2016 Championship userbars are here!

1089 Mentor & Alum | 2016 MAR Championship Finalists, Innovation in Control Award Winners
2015 Archimedes Champions | 2015 Einstein Semi-Finalists
2014 MAR Championship Finalists | 2014 Bridgewater District Finalists | 2013 Lenape District Finalists | 2011 NJ Regional Finalists
2014 & 2015 Excellence in Engineering Award | 2014 Xerox Creativity Award
2009, 2011, 2013 KCP&B Entrepreneurship Award Winners | 2012 Gracious Professionalism Award Winners | 2009 NJ Regional Chairman's Award Winners

"Success in life is a matter not so much of talent or opportunity as of concentration and perseverance." C.W. Wendte
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 14:25
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,634
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: FIRST Wish List

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billfred
I've said it before, I'll say it again: a game scored in real-time, as opposed to once the field comes to rest. The technology is out there, and it means you'll have N robots out there looking to deliver their payloads fast and often, putting an emphasis on reliability.
The problem with that is that it would limit the style of game we could play. The 2004 game would work, sense there is no de-scoring, but this year's would not, as the ownership of the rows is constantly changing. And so far the tech that we have tried to display real-time estimated scoring hasnt been entirely sucessful.
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 15:02
Scott Morgan Scott Morgan is offline
Registered User
None #1138
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 129
Scott Morgan has a spectacular aura aboutScott Morgan has a spectacular aura aboutScott Morgan has a spectacular aura about
Re: FIRST Wish List

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle
I would like to see auto mode go longer then 15 seconds and a game with more ways to score, it gives teams the chance to make different types of bots instead of just capers or box bots.
I think a game with more more emphassis on autonoumous would be good
however i believe that the amount that can be accomplished in autonoumous should be somewhat limited in order to avoid being to unfair to new teams
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 15:24
Covey41 Covey41 is offline
Registered User
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 58
Covey41 is a glorious beacon of lightCovey41 is a glorious beacon of lightCovey41 is a glorious beacon of lightCovey41 is a glorious beacon of lightCovey41 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: FIRST Wish List

All this talk about changing the elimination rounds, auto/driver times are great ideas.

But lets address one or two of the basics.

Consistency: As we all experienced this season, each event was run differently from each other. Each Head Ref, or Lead Robot Inspector had their own ideas how rules the should be interpreted, or they added their own when they felt that FIRST missed something. I know that FIRST has numerous ways of communicating with all the Officials, but as we see this does not always work. I also know that these people are volunteers working a very difficult job,(Having been a Head Ref/Lead Inspector.) and are only trying to do their best. Still something needs to be done to make sure each event is the same, with no surprises when we reach the championships.

Scoring System: If you kept up with CD this comp season you know or heard about all the scoring system issues. Each year FIRST seams to reinvent the wheel. The Hatch system while not perfect, seamed to work better each week. Lets keep the Hatch system, let them make it even better. Lets not have what happen this year, next year.

How can FIRST help to make sure these things do not happen again next year. Maybe they need to have a team of officials that travel to each event. They would only need 5 or 6 teams. The team would be made up of a Head Ref, Lead Inspector, Field Supervisor, and a Score keeper. ( I believe that part of the problems with scoring was a new score keeper each week trying to learn a system that was not perfect.)At least there will be only 5 or 6 different ways, not 30.

The other thing that would help, would be to have the Game Design Committee not make changes at any event. I saw twice this year where students went to a member of the GDC, complained, and the GDC member had the Head Ref change their call. I also witnessed a time when one was asked about seeding and gave an answer that was completely wrong, and effected the outcome of the event. It would help (My opinion.) that no changes be made after Week 1 events, unless safety related. Sometimes there are a lot of bad feelings generated by these decisions.

This is my $.02.

At no time was it my intention to insult anyone, or to make anyone feel offended!
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 15:29
Ian Curtis Ian Curtis is offline
Best Available Data
FRC #1778 (Chill Out!)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 2,521
Ian Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond reputeIan Curtis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FIRST Wish List

The head refs are generally repeats. Benge Ambrogi(sp?) was the head ref at BAE and at the Championship Event and probably other places as well (he's done it previous years as well).
__________________
CHILL OUT! | Aero Stability & Control Engineer
Adam Savage's Obsessions (TED Talk) (Part 2)
It is much easier to call someone else a genius than admit to yourself that you are lazy. - Dave Gingery
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 15:29
xzvrw2's Avatar
xzvrw2 xzvrw2 is offline
Its been a long time.
AKA: Stevie Alvarado
FRC #0065 (The Huskie Brigade)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Pontiac, Michigan
Posts: 1,170
xzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond reputexzvrw2 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to xzvrw2
Re: FIRST Wish List

Ok in reading the posts about the elim rounds I have came up with an idea that I want people to comment on.

At nationals the four divisions; Archimedes, Newton, Galileo, and Curie; are broken up into eight divisions. And in each of those divisions, every team in it, plays with and against every team in that division. So lets say 65, 217, 71, 233, 67, 111, 469, 330, 254, 229, 64, and 66 are all in one division on the Archimedes field, (hey a kid can dream can't he) then they all play with and against each other: 65, 66, 67 against 217, 71, 111 is one match and 233, 330, 469 against 254, 64, 229. Then the next two matches would be 65, 217, 71 against 469, 229, 66 and 111, 330, 64 against 67, 233, 254 and so on. And then after they all played with and against each other the top seed would pick two other teams to be in the alliance. Then the elims would be the number one seeds and their alliances of each division, they would all play each other for the Arch, Newton, Galileo, or Curie division, depending on which division they are in. Then the winners of the four big divisions would play on Einstein field just like regular.



Those are my thoughts, please comment.
__________________
my FIRST acomplishments: 2003:GLR Chairmans winner, MWR Finalist, Archimedes Division winner, National Champion (w/ 111 and 469) 2004:MWR Finalist 2005:GLR Chairmans winner, MWR Finalist, MWR Innovation in Controls award 2006:hmmm wow, umm we got picked 4th overall at Nats by 121
my FIRST resume: 65 (2003-2006)
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 08-05-2005, 16:57
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
TSIMFD
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 6,634
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: FIRST Wish List

Quote:
Originally Posted by Covey41
The other thing that would help, would be to have the Game Design Committee not make changes at any event. I saw twice this year where students went to a member of the GDC, complained, and the GDC member had the Head Ref change their call. I also witnessed a time when one was asked about seeding and gave an answer that was completely wrong, and effected the outcome of the event. It would help (My opinion.) that no changes be made after Week 1 events, unless safety related. Sometimes there are a lot of bad feelings generated by these decisions.
The GDC members are typically only brought into the picture when a call is flat out wrong or when there is question about the intent of a rule. When the refs cant determine the exact meaning of a rule as it applies to the situation, if there is a GDC member nearby they will often consult him. But those are the only 2 times I have seen a GDC member step in.
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
**FIRST EMAIL**/Second Event Registration Reminder and Wait List Information Rich Wong FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive 0 27-10-2004 17:16


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi