Go to Post Shouldn't we be encouraging exploration instead of repeatedly beating it with a stick? - Mike Soukup [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > FRC Game Design
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 7 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 05-27-2005, 07:38 PM
RyanMcE RyanMcE is offline
Still Learning...
FRC #0492 (Titan Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 60
RyanMcE will become famous soon enough
Re: [Official 2006 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2006 game...

Game is three alliances - red, green, and blue - of two robots each on the field at the same time. Field is a 30 to 40 foot square. One alliance starts on each of three sides of the field. The fourth side opens to the audience.

There is a merry-go-round in the center of the field. This is a standard playground merry-go-round, maybe about 8 feet diameter, but without the handle bars. So its just a platform in the middle of the field that can spin. It is about one foot off the ground. At the beginning of the match, the merry-go-round begins to spin up. As the match progresses, the merry-go-round continues to accelerate, so it becomes exceedingly difficult to get on, or once on, stay on. But back to that later.

Facing each players station, there is a ramp leading up to the edge of the merry-go round, so getting on and off is facilitated. The three ramps form a one foot deep "chasm" on the side of the field facing the audience. The chasm is filled with hundreds of yellow, green, red, and blue golf balls. There are several layers of golf balls. In other words, nightmarish conditions to drive a robot around in. The golf balls are the primary scoring object, of course.

To score, a team brings golf balls from the chasm to their side of the field, where the balls are dropped into into chutes that automatically count the balls, then return them to the chasm. Kind of like fancy miniature golf. I imagine the chutes as about a foot off the ground, and about a foot deep from the driver's station. This way, the chutes are easy to access and extend across the entire side of the field, so scoring is relatively simple and therefore extremely hard to defend. As a result, no penalties are needed to prevent defensive strategies.

Each yellow ball scored subtracts a point from any team, while getting a ball with the proper team color adds ten points. Balls with the wrong team color subtract five points. If the balls are equally distributed, this means that a random dump of balls would be worth, on average, negative one quarter point per ball. So thats not very useful - but getting the right kind of ball is very useful. So, "autonomous" is ongoing, because the golf balls are far too many, too far away, and in a chasm, so the drivers will have no idea really what they are getting. The CMUcam will have to be figured out. Sorting through the golf balls then becomes a programmer's primary concern. Autonomous is no longer necessarily a "period," but an ongoing feature.

Now, back to the spinning merry-go-round. A robot on the top of the merry-go round at the end of a match adds a multiplier to their alliance's score. So the first robot increases the multiplier from 1x to 2x and the second robot from 2x to 3x. Its a huge bonus, but with some great ball collectors, it could be overcome. Or, if your alliance has a negative score near the end of the match, you will want to stay off.

The qualifications are scored in the following completely convoluted manner: take each alliance's score and rank them, from lowest to highest corresponding to one through three. For each alliance, multiply this ranking by the sum of the opposing alliances' scores. This becomes the ranking points. The ranking itself becomes qualification points. Or to leave it more convoluted, do away with qualification points altogether.

Eliminations will be even more fun. There will be nine alliances of three teams each. The first semi-final will see alliances 1, 8 and 9 go against each other. Each round will consist of three games. At the end of the third game, the team with the highest ranking out of qualification point and ranking points those three rounds advances. Each round, the alliances precess around the field, so that any favoritism from a particular starting spot is nullified. The second semifinal will face off against alliances 2, 6, and 7. The third will face off teams 3, 4, and 5. There will be thee teams left after this. The final will consist of the same format.

To adequately take into account disqualifications during the finals, an alliance's score will be equal to the score they would have gotten times the number of not disqualified robots they have at the end of the match. So if a one team gets disqualified, it essentially halves the score of the alliance. And if both get disqualified, then the alliance gets a score of zero.

Oh, and one more thing. An alliance must not ever send out the same two robots during a round. So, each of the three alliance partners will play twice in a round. This stresses bottom-to-top strength in an alliance, instead of a "main pair" and an "alternate pair" that both include the same strongest robot.

What do you all think? Yes, I am insane...
__________________
Titan Robotics Club (Team 492) Co-Founder, Alumni & Mentor

#1 in the Northwest: 2001 Silicon Valley Regional Rookie All-Star Award || 2001 Galileo Incredible Play Award || 2002 Southern California Regional Judge's Award || 2002 Pacific Northwest Regional Finalist || 2003 Silicon Valley Regional Entrepreneurship Award || 2003 Pacific Northwest Regional Website Award || 2003 Pacific Northwest Regional Finalist || 2003 Pacific Northwest Regional Engineering Inspiration Award || 2004 Pacific Northwest Website Award || 2004 Pacific Northwest Regional Champions (#1 seed) || 2004 Galileo Semi-Finalist || 2005 Pacific Northwest Regional General Motors Industiral Design Award || 2005 Pacific Northwest Regional Champions (#1 seed) || 2005 Galileo Finalist

"We'll do better next time" -- Team Motto
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2002 game prediction contest!!! Ken Leung Rumor Mill 41 12-31-2007 06:18 PM
[Official 2005 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2005 game... dlavery FRC Game Design 37 10-26-2004 11:15 PM
On Game Design Matt Leese General Forum 38 04-30-2004 07:08 PM
game design challenge: what was your entry Ryan Foley General Forum 1 03-20-2003 09:42 PM
Ok, so YOU design the 2003 game... dlavery General Forum 157 01-07-2003 11:55 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 AM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi