Go to Post Remember, WWGD? (What would Grandma Do?) - Vikesrock [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Motors
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-06-2005, 12:34
ChuckDickerson's Avatar
ChuckDickerson ChuckDickerson is offline
Mentor / Bayou & CMP Division LRI
FRC #0456 (Siege Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Vicksburg, MS
Posts: 877
ChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond reputeChuckDickerson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Cheap Torque Measurement?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Betts
Efficiency at Max Power = (1.23 N*m * 280 rad/sec) / (12V * 57A) = 50%

Therefore, the mechanical power at the spindle will be 343W and I would expect the power dissipated in the generator’s brake resistor to be about 172W or so…
Mike,

What is your source for these numbers? The only source I have seen for the CIM motor specs is from the FIRST web site but some of the numbers don't quite match: http://www2.usfirst.org/2005comp/Specs/CIM.pdf

I am by no means trying to nit pick and I understand your numbers were just an example of the calculation but I am just wondering if there is another better source for the CIM motor specs that I should be using that I don't know about.

Using your example but taking the numbers for max power directly from the FIRST PDF spec sheet above I get that the efficiency is even worse (41%).

Torque = 171.7 Oz-In = 1.21 N*m
Speed = 2655 RPM = 278 rad/sec
Current = 67.9 A
Power = 337 W
Efficiency = 41% = (1.21 N*m * 278 rad/sec) / (12V * 67.9A)

The should be at least 337 W * 41 % = 138 W.

Thanks,
Chuck
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-06-2005, 13:05
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
On to my 16th year in FRC
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 8,508
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Cheap Torque Measurement?

Here's some specs that FIRST gave us on the CIM in 2002 if these are of any help.
Stall Torque: 2.22 N-m
Stall Current: 107 A
Free (no load) speed: 5,500 RPM
Free (no load) current: 2.3 A
Peak Power: 321 W
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 13-06-2005, 13:57
Unsung FIRST Hero
Mike Betts Mike Betts is offline
Electrical Engineer
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Rookie Year: 1995
Location: Homosassa, FL
Posts: 1,442
Mike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond reputeMike Betts has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Cheap Torque Measurement?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeepWater
...What is your source for these numbers? ...
Chuck,

My source was: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=32796

Note that even the pros will have variations in measurements from motor to motor due to manufacturing variations. Even the room temperature and relative humidity will affect performance.

The difference in numbers is no biggie. I'd expect that you would want to design the load/brake resistor for 200 or 225W continuous operation...

Mike
__________________
Mike Betts

Alumnus, Team 3518, Panthrobots, 2011
Alumnus, Team 177, Bobcat Robotics, 1995 - 2010
LRI, Connecticut Regional, 2007-2010
LRI, WPI Regional, 2009 - 2010
RI, South Florida Regional, 2012 - 2013

As easy as 355/113...
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Torque curves BionicAlumni Motors 4 29-04-2004 20:07
Power, speed, and torque... AGH Gui Cavalcanti Technical Discussion 5 10-11-2002 19:02
Friction, traction, torque - oh my... Gui Cavalcanti Technical Discussion 30 13-08-2002 18:01
Gear Woes Simon G Technical Discussion 14 24-01-2002 16:31
Traction Limited, rather than torque Simon G Technical Discussion 6 23-01-2002 07:08


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi