creating your own HUD YAAAAY!!!

[mechanicalbrain]

but agian your compairing apples to roated cow tung. im using equipment readily available to anyone. all the examples you give are people being used to an advantage. im using a readily available sensor to have a different perspective. and NO i wouldnt be knowingly cheating since i feal that the rules are contradictory in nature and i would resent any implication of that statement if i wasnt sure you were using that statment as advice. this is like if someone used a CMU cam to find and move balls in last years game you would also be angry?

[sanddrag]

Originally Posted by mechanicalbrain

but agian your compairing apples to roated cow tung. im using equipment readily available to anyone. all the examples you give are people being used to an advantage. im using a readily available sensor to have a different perspective. and NO i wouldnt be knowingly cheating since i feal that the rules are contradictory in nature and i would resent any implication of that statement if i wasnt sure you were using that statment as advice. this is like if someone used a CMU cam to find and move balls in last years game you would also be angry?

Just because something is available to everyone doesn't mean it's allowed. There are certain things you just cannot have or use for certain purposes. Also, unfortunately what you "feel" the rules are isn't necesarrily the way FIRST "feels" the rules are.

Anyway, the heart of the matter is what I said before. FIRST doesn't want the drivers getting any feedback that is not coming through the IFI radio. It is part of the game/design challenge.

If you could somehow use the camera to seek out targets, it is possible you could have an auxiliary circuiot that could process what the camera sees, and then send that info to the RC so the RC can make a desicion to "seek" out that target or not. That would be legal. But any feedback directly to the driver without first going through the RC is not allowed. For example, you could not have an independent LED/LCD display that receives data from some encoders with wireless interfaces (if there were such a thing) in your driver station that tells you the RPM of your drive motors. The camera is no different.

Note: I do think it is a really cool idea if FIRST ever did allow it and/or for experimentation/demos/etc.

[Cory]

Originally Posted by mechanicalbrain

but agian your compairing apples to roated cow tung. im using equipment readily available to anyone. all the examples you give are people being used to an advantage. im using a readily available sensor to have a different perspective. and NO i wouldnt be knowingly cheating since i feal that the rules are contradictory in nature and i would resent any implication of that statement if i wasnt sure you were using that statment as advice. this is like if someone used a CMU cam to find and move balls in last years game you would also be angry?

Actually, you're comparing two separate things. The CMU cam is a kit provided electronic device. It DOES NOT transmit anything to the driver's station, which is what makes it legal, so no, I wouldn't be mad if you used it in the manner you described.

It really doesn't matter what you "feel" about a rule. A rule is a rule is a rule, and the rules say you are wrong. The rule you quoted says you may use a camera. The rule I quoted says you may not receive the transmitted data from such a camera in the driver's station. I don't understand what is contradictory about that.

It wasn't an implication. I was telling you that if you somehow manage to sneak a camera on your robot, and receive images from it in the driver's station, you are cheating

[mechanicalbrain]

Cory it was never my intention to anger you if you wish to discuss this matter further feel free to email me at mechabunnyATgmailDOTcom but i would appreciate you keeping aggressive posts of this forum and on a more private chat method. as to me feeling about rules that pertains to the reference of me cheating. i cant be knowingly cheating if i believe the rules are open to interpretation but if it will placate you i promise to specifically mention the camera to our inspector and i wish to remind you that this whole conversation is speculative as we don't know what the rules will be next year. I'm sorry for any feathers i may have ruffled.

[santosh]

We had a Camera that the Discovery channel put on our last year at nationals for a show they did on us and 3 other teams.

[mechanicalbrain]

right exactly. and even if next year rules make my idea invalid i can still use it in the stands or even record picture from the camera which would be way cool.

[Mike Schroeder]

Originally Posted by mechanicalbrain

and certian judges allow things that others would red flag.

so its okay to break the rules, just as long as no one gets caught? cause if so this is the poorest example of gracious professionalism i have ever seen

and an FYI, the inspectors are not FIRST engineers, or referees, which means that the rules involving no transmitting to the playerstation, would fall upon the head ref and the ref staff, not an inspector

[Conor Ryan]

Ok i like the fact that this is freakishly cool. It would put quite and intresting spin on the competition. But the thing about this is, its definetly not a subtle feature, all inspectors would question it. I doubt it'd be allowed in the drivers station, thats my gut instinct on this one, but AV uses for it would be pretty cool. You'd get some serious video footage too. But it will be questioned at ANY Offical First competition.

[ahecht]

I don't think these 2005 Q&As are unclear:

1355 Section: 5.3.4.2 Status: Answered Date Answered: 1/28/2005
Q: Can we use cameras other than the CMUCam2 (such as a USB webcam) on the robot along with one or two CMUCam2s?

A: Yes if the part meets the 2005 Part Use Flowchart and you do not provide live feedback to your drivers.




1039 Section: 5.3.4.2 Status: Answered Date Answered: 1/11/2005
Q: Are we able to have a mounted camera on the robot providing live feedback from the arena floor?

A: Cameras are allowed with FIRST's permission but the video output cannot be transmitted to your drivers for control purposes during any match.



1278 Section: 5.3.1 Status: Answered Date Answered: 1/24/2005
Q: We need to clear the use of a secure 2.4Ghz 802.11b based camera on our robot for giving drivers a 1st person view along with the possibility of transmitting to the "jumbotron" in the competition for the crowd's benefit, is either idea ok?

A: Permission should be requested onsite from the Innovation First representative. Live feedback to the driver station is NOT allowed. With permission, we have allowed live video to be shown via the large screen for short periods of time.

[mechanicalbrain]

thanks for that last post no one showed it to me and i had trouble finding it on FIRST. and as to the certian inspectors redflag different things im saying that certian inspectors will point at something and say its off but if you went to another they would look at it and say its fine thats just the way it is we had two look at our robot and and flat out disagree. its not anyhting to do with the rules (at least in the context im using i know now that the camera scratchs pretty hard on some of the rules) just something that erks one wont another and that statement got pretty misunderstood im not talking about sneaking anything through or cheating im saying there are stricter inspectors than others. i didnt have any intention to sneak anything at the time from the info i had i thought it would be an interpritation of rules now ive decided to use it to display dashboard info to our driver which i hope is legal and i would like to thank sanddrag for his helpfull advice as i still intend to use the camera but so our team members in the stands can get an awsome view (which means the camera is no longer a custom circuit and now a nonfunctional decoration) i hope this clears some things up and i still hope next years rules change thank you for your support or constructional criticism.

[Greg Perkins]

sigh...

this will happen every year with some sort of topic....cameras used for live feedback have been banned since i started first in 2000. every year its been something like the camera topic that has been stressed by teams for their own beneifits. IE wedges, and shrouds. i think that instead of finding the grey area in every single rule, you should just follow them the way first wrote them, sure there are updates to clarify them, BUT WHY MUST WE KEEP LOOKING FOR GREY AREAS??? CAN WE NOT JUST PLAY THE GAME AS A GAME AND NOT TAKE IT SO SERIOUS? i know i didnt want to become an engineer because i won an award. i got enthusiastic about engineering because of the many different aspects of the robots...not finding shortcuts to win....sorry if this upsets people but its really childish.

[mechanicalbrain]

if you read my previous post i was not looking for grey areas i thought when the post first started it was black and white and after i FINALLY got someone to show me text that contradicted my idea i proposed a new use. you are mistaken in the content of your post i in no way was trying to blur the rules for my own benefit. also that same enthusiasm is what prompted me to this idea in the first place.

[Greg Perkins]

i wasnt criticizing you in particular, it happens every year with some topic...

[mechanicalbrain]

This thread was meant to be a place for people to talk about uses of HUDs and how to make them cooler NOT AN ARGUMENT OVER THE lEGALITY OF A CAMERA i apoligize to all who posted here with that misconception and i admit to letting the thread get away from me and so i have decided to post a bunch of cool uses.
if connected to an IR camera you now have a night vision headset. you can connect it to your TV for your own personal screen (cool when playing Halo 2) you can also mount a camera to a RC like a car or plane and get a really good view . oh and they would be excellent to use as a mini screen for working with flight simulation programs (my dad wants to borrow it for work )

[ahecht]

Originally Posted by mechanicalbrain

no one showed it to me and i had trouble finding it on FIRST.

Let me just plug the site that I found the info on: FIRSTSearch (thanks AIBob!).

FIRSTSearch should be in every FIRSTers bookmarks.