Go to Post These two options can both be used effectively to create a wonderful experience for the students, but limiting them to one area is like taking a globe, slicing it in half, and saying, "You can only explore this half." - Alex Golec [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
View Poll Results: What is your favorite material for making a robot frame?
metal (if you like a specific type list it) 44 89.80%
wood 0 0%
plastics (all types) 2 4.08%
carbon fiber composite 3 6.12%
other (please list) 0 0%
Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-09-2005, 23:16
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
On to my 16th year in FRC
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 8,515
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Construction materials

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Guzman
Please someone correct me if I'm wrong but I think you are not allowed to use exotic metals in FIRST which would include Titanium.
You are wrong. That rule hasn't been in place since 2003 when they made illegal Titanium, Carbon Fiber, and Beryllium (and I believe Diamond too). Check section 5.3.4.2 of the 2005 Manual. The only rules to be conserned about really are

<R35> Additional Parts shall not be made from hazardous materials or be unsafe

and then the rules about Cost Accounting and suppliers. Follow the flowchart and you will see that Titanium will pass.

In 2004 we successfully passed inspection with titanium parts on our robot which the inspectors were made fully aware of.
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-09-2005, 23:24
mechanicalbrain's Avatar
mechanicalbrain mechanicalbrain is offline
The red haired Dremel gnome!
FRC #0623 (Ohm robotics)
Team Role: Electrical
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,221
mechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to mechanicalbrain Send a message via Yahoo to mechanicalbrain
Re: Construction materials

I wish i did have pics but we straightened the bend. A robot hit us hard at the clash and bent the side piece (we used the kit frame). Anyhew our robot was on three wheels for a while.

I think FIRST classifies exotic material as something not easily obtainable like a frame made of carbon nano tubes or radio active materials. (Battle Bots seriously lists this as a banned construction material) I think it applies to anything that you can't go to a store or online and just buy or make. I still don't think anyone would make a frame out of titanium. However molding fiberglass or carbon fiber could make it onto a FIRST robot.

Hey Sanddrag what parts were titanium and how did they work out weight wise.
__________________
"Oh my God! There's an axe in my head."
623's 2006 home page
random mechanicalbrain slogans

  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-09-2005, 23:39
David Guzman's Avatar
David Guzman David Guzman is offline
Registered User
AKA: Dave
FRC #1251 (The Techtigers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Broward, FL
Posts: 522
David Guzman has a brilliant futureDavid Guzman has a brilliant futureDavid Guzman has a brilliant futureDavid Guzman has a brilliant futureDavid Guzman has a brilliant futureDavid Guzman has a brilliant futureDavid Guzman has a brilliant futureDavid Guzman has a brilliant futureDavid Guzman has a brilliant futureDavid Guzman has a brilliant futureDavid Guzman has a brilliant future
Re: Construction materials

Thanks for the correction, i truly though they were not allowed. Well i guess no i have more things to play with . Also how did you machine your titanium parts and where did you buy the material?

Dave
__________________
Team 1251 The Techtigers
2010 FL Regional Winner (BIG thanks to 86 and 1612)
2009 FL Regional Finalist (BIG thanks to 79 and 744)
2008 FL Regional Winner, FL GM Industrial Design, SC GM Industrial Design
2007 FL Regional Winner, FL GM Industrial Design, Palmetto Regional Finalist, Palmetto Motorola Quality.
2006 Palmetto Regional Winner, Daimler Chrysler Team Spirit Award
2005 FL Regional Judges Award, FL Regional 3rd seeded and finalist, Palmetto Regional Xerox Creativity Award, Palmetto Regional 1st seeded and finalist
2004 UCF Regional Rookie All-star Award
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 21-09-2005, 23:45
mechanicalbrain's Avatar
mechanicalbrain mechanicalbrain is offline
The red haired Dremel gnome!
FRC #0623 (Ohm robotics)
Team Role: Electrical
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,221
mechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond reputemechanicalbrain has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to mechanicalbrain Send a message via Yahoo to mechanicalbrain
Re: Construction materials

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Guzman
Thanks for the correction, i truly though they were not allowed. Well i guess no i have more things to play with . Also how did you machine your titanium parts and where did you buy the material?

Dave
I love google! Titanium suppliers how to machine titanium how to make titanium turn into groovy colors
__________________
"Oh my God! There's an axe in my head."
623's 2006 home page
random mechanicalbrain slogans


Last edited by mechanicalbrain : 21-09-2005 at 23:50.
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2005, 00:07
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
On to my 16th year in FRC
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 8,515
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Construction materials

696 used 1/8" titanium plate which was lasercut. The plates had a 1/2" hole with an 1/8" keyway in them. They were used affix an aluminum sheet metal arm to a keyed shaft so the arm moved when the shaft was rotated. Plates were keyed to the shaft (by the small 1/8" thickness) and bolted to the arm. Also, we used them in a similar method to affix pulleys to the shaft.
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2005, 00:07
BrianBSL BrianBSL is offline
Registered User
FRC #0190
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 251
BrianBSL has much to be proud ofBrianBSL has much to be proud ofBrianBSL has much to be proud ofBrianBSL has much to be proud ofBrianBSL has much to be proud ofBrianBSL has much to be proud ofBrianBSL has much to be proud ofBrianBSL has much to be proud ofBrianBSL has much to be proud ofBrianBSL has much to be proud of
Re: Construction materials

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Blair
Titanium is not all it's cracked up to be, at least from a FIRST aspect. Its extremely strong, but so is steel. Titanium is almost twice as heavy as aluminum. I can have the bragging aspect of making a bullet resistant robot, but if someone is coming into a competition and shooting my robot, I have more important things to worry about!

Check this PDF out: http://www.engr.ku.edu/~rhale/ae510/titanium.pdf
But isnt steel almost twice as heavy as titanium?

190 used titanium shafts for a lot of stuff last year, as well as some 1/16 or 3/32 plate for protecting some parts.. Definitally helps cut down the weight - I don't have exact #'s but I would estimate it saved atleast 3-4 lbs.
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2005, 00:15
sanddrag sanddrag is offline
On to my 16th year in FRC
FRC #0696 (Circuit Breakers)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 8,515
sanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond reputesanddrag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Construction materials

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianBSL
But isnt steel almost twice as heavy as titanium?
Yes. Titanium is about 1.66 times the weight of 6061 aluminum and mild steel is about 1.74 times the weight of titanium.

So, titanium isn't your "strength of steel with the weight of aluminum" that a lot of people make it out to be. With regards to weight (density really) it is between aluminum and steel.

Nominal Densities in lb/in^3

6061 Aluminum - .098
Titanium - .163
Mild Steel - .284
__________________
Teacher/Engineer/Machinist - Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2011 - Present
Mentor/Engineer/Machinist, Team 968 RAWC, 2007-2010
Technical Mentor, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2005-2007
Student Mechanical Leader and Driver, Team 696 Circuit Breakers, 2002-2004
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2005, 00:28
Cory's Avatar
Cory Cory is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cory McBride
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 6,812
Cory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond reputeCory has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Cory
Re: Construction materials

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag
Yes. Titanium is about 1.66 times the weight of 6061 aluminum and mild steel is about 1.74 times the weight of titanium.

So, titanium isn't your "strength of steel with the weight of aluminum" that a lot of people make it out to be. With regards to weight (density really) it is between aluminum and steel.

Nominal Densities in lb/in^3

6061 Aluminum - .098
Titanium - .163
Mild Steel - .284
The idea is since it's stronger, you use less of it, thereby saving weight over aluminum.
__________________
2001-2004: Team 100
2006-Present: Team 254
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2005, 01:12
Matt Adams's Avatar
Matt Adams Matt Adams is offline
b(o_o)d
FRC #1525 (Warbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Arlington Hts. IL
Posts: 375
Matt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond reputeMatt Adams has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Matt Adams
Re: Construction materials

Just so we're on the same page... I think the term that many of you have nearly hit on is "strength to weight ratio."

This varies widely depending on the type of each material (hot vs. cold rolled, heat treating, carbon content, etc) ... but here's a rough guide:

Average Off The Rack Steel (1020 Carbon Steel)
Density: 0.284 lbs / in³
Yield Strength: 50,800 PSI
S:W Ratio: 178,873

Aluminum (6063-T6):
Density: 0.0975 lbs / in³
Yield Strength: 36,000 PSI
S:W Ratio: 480,000

Titanium (Grade 2)
0.162 lb/in³
Yield Strength: 40,000 PSI
S:W Ratio: 246,913

Titanium (Grade 5)
0.162 lb/in³
Yield Strength: 106,000 PSI
S:W Ratio: 654,320

I'll let you guys do the (Strength to Weight) to Dollar ratio, but the end answer is that steel ends up being the big big winner in that category.

Matt
__________________
Matt Adams - Engineer at Danaher Motion
Team 1525 - Warbots - Deerfield High School
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2005, 02:02
Veselin Kolev's Avatar
Veselin Kolev Veselin Kolev is offline
X51 Production Company PGM (TM)
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 253
Veselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond reputeVeselin Kolev has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Construction materials

Over the summer I did a lot of design and fab work for Berkeley National Labs. Even though it wasn’t robotics you could adapt the concepts and use something like this:

-Cast, porous silicon carbide
-Heat treated aircraft aluminum (surprisingly cheap and easy to make, terribly hard)
-Bronze aluminum alloys

But those are really expensive or hard to do. Unless you get them donated by Berkeley, I don’t recommend you use them. If you’re creative, you can always.. um.. cast your own silicon carbide? I don’t recommend it to anyone with little casting experience. For obvious reasons.

Especially in using aircraft aluminum, if you have the tools to draw the beams in slight arcs (say, radius 200ft) and weld them together with the curve outward, welded as if they were straight, they give your chassis a bouncy feel to it. Kindof makes your chassis into a giant spring. But you have to be VERY careful when you weld it. Tac it here and there to keep it together, and then weld it SYMETRICALLY. If you don’t, your chassis will bend. It takes a lot of practice to weld like this.

If you don’t exactly have a drawer (I expect you don’t) you can always go to an exhaust pipe shop and have them heat treat and bend your tubing for you. It’ll cost a bit, but your chassis will bounce instead of bend. It has worked very well in the past.
__________________
X51 Production Company
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2005, 07:13
Joe J.'s Avatar
Joe J. Joe J. is offline
My Gaming Is FIRST!
AKA: Joey
FRC #0862 (Lightning Robotics)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Canton, MI, USA
Posts: 804
Joe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Joe J.
Re: Construction materials

We use L channel Aluminum makes for easy construction using our Hacksaw & Drill method, our entire frame was pop riveted together. We tried using box channel Aluminum in 2004 which we welded together (most of those welds broke and needed to be bolted back together) Also when we tightened stuff down the box channel tended to crush, we don't have that problem with the L channel. We built our main frame around the KOP drive train and just bolted it down. We did use wood as a base plate in the bottom of the frame because it lighter and easier to mount things to than metal (plus we have had base plates that were supposed to be Aluminum magically "transform" in to 1/8 inch thick steel plate)
__________________
Joe Jagadics
Lead Mentor / Coach
Lightning Robotics FRC Team 862

  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2005, 09:58
Wetzel's Avatar
Wetzel Wetzel is offline
DC Robotics
FRC #2914 (Tiger Pride)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: DC
Posts: 3,522
Wetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond reputeWetzel has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Wetzel
Re: Construction materials

I don't see nearly enough PVC.

Wetzel
__________________
Viva Olancho!
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2005, 11:43
ChrisH's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
ChrisH ChrisH is offline
Generally Useless
FRC #0330 (Beach 'Bots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 1,230
ChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond reputeChrisH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Construction materials

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wetzel
I don't see nearly enough PVC.

Wetzel
While not particulaly stiff, PVC is reasonably close to low grade aluminum in strength and has terrific elongation with a minimal weight impact. This enables it to absorb a terriffic amount of energy without breaking.

PVC is great for arms or other appendages. We used it for our arm last year and it proved to be extremely durable. Team Hammond ah also used PVC with great success in the past (2002) to build arms that survived tremendous forces.

But these applications did not require the PVC to help maintain a reasonably close alignment between components. Frames usually serve exactly that purpose, keeping the wheels and gears in reasonably close alignment, among other things. So I'd be a little leary of a PVC frame. Such a fame would probably weigh more than an aluminum frame that does the same job.
__________________
Christopher H Husmann, PE

"Who is John Galt?"
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2005, 12:01
Paul Copioli's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero Woodie Flowers Award
Paul Copioli Paul Copioli is offline
President, VEX Robotics, Inc.
FRC #3310 (Black Hawk Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Rockwall, TX
Posts: 1,391
Paul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond reputePaul Copioli has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Construction materials

Aluminum sheet metal is the ThunderChickens' preferred choice of material / configuration.

A couple of things to consider when weighing the steel vs. aluminum design choice.

1. Aluminum is ~ 1/3 the weight of steel

2. 6061 -T6, 6063 -T6, etc. aluminum is >1/2 the strength of your average steel. The exceptions are your alloy steels like 4140, 4150, etc.

3. Manufacturing constraints. If you calculate that a steel tube only needs to be 1/64" thick to be strong enough for your design, chances are you will not be able to use such a thin walled tube due to manufacturing limitations. So, by definition, your steel tube will be over designed due to the fact that you had to select a more readily available tube size. Aluminum, for example would need to be twice as thick (almost), but that still is pushing it for availability (1/32"). The aluminum would be over designed, too; but the weight penalty is much, much less.

4. Part geometry is more important than material selection. How your part handles the external load is much more important than what material you should use. In most cases on FIRST robots, we have more material than in we need in some places and less than we need in others. That single phenomenon is the leading cause of robot failures.

I can tell you this from an industrial point of view: Aluminum is the preferred material for housings, cases, etc. for economical, environmental, and cost reasons. Gears, shafting, and anywhere that needs small space, but high loads will usually be steel or titanium.

Composites are at a whole different level that I will leave to the spacecraft and aircraft people.


-Paul
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 22-09-2005, 12:16
Gdeaver Gdeaver is offline
Registered User
FRC #1640
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: West Chester, Pa.
Posts: 1,367
Gdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond reputeGdeaver has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Construction materials

I agree with the the aluminum angle and pop-rivets. The frame can be crafted with only hand tools. T6061-t6 aluminum is readily available and cost effective. Do not use 6063. Use steel pop-rivets with backup washers. We usually use 1 x 1 - 1/8" wall. We cover the sides and top with poly carbonate attached with velcro. Mcmaster Carr sells velcro with real good adhesive. The poly adds structural strength. Welding the aluminum frame up is probably a bad idea unless a team has professional resources. Welding removes the heat treatment from a area next to the weld and can induce stress in to the metal from the expansion and cooling. Few teams will have the resources to stress relieve and reheat treat the whole frame. If a weld breaks during competition its a big deal. Drilling out some pop-rivets and fixing a frame is much faster. We have taken some massive impacts and not had frame problems. Buy some double end drill bits for the pop rivet holes.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2005 Championship Conference materials available! dez250 General Forum 1 09-05-2005 11:29
Promotional Materials Amanda Morrison General Forum 9 02-04-2005 14:02
Materials Jeff K. General Forum 11 22-01-2005 02:24
additional materials Penn Robotics Off-Season Events 1 01-11-2001 23:25
Additional allowed materials kmcclary Off-Season Events 3 11-10-2001 13:05


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi