Go to Post I'm sure they liked the size and power output but disliked when they were on fire. - notmattlythgoe [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-10-2005, 16:29
Koko Ed's Avatar
Koko Ed Koko Ed is offline
Serial Volunteer
AKA: Ed Patterson
FRC #0191 (X-Cats)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Rochester,NY
Posts: 22,928
Koko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond reputeKoko Ed has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Should teams be pushed to make higher quality robots?

I would like to see teams be pushed to make a more quality FIRST program (more school involvement, community involvement, help to strengthen the local and national FIRST scene and such) then I would "just building a quality robot". FIRST can only become stronger when teams strive to lift up the program and not just build the robot and leave it at that.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-10-2005, 17:29
Madison's Avatar
Madison Madison is offline
Dancing through life...
FRC #0488 (Xbot)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,243
Madison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond reputeMadison has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Should teams be pushed to make higher quality robots?

My experience -- all 7 years of it, if you can imagine -- has been that teams that produce robots that have a high polish in design, fabrication and function have a better understanding of process than do teams that haphazardly and aimlessly assemble a robot. Both deserve to be proud of their efforts and, undoubtedly, both have learned something new that they did not know yesterday, last season, or last year -- but they're proud of different accomplishments. In other words, some teams are proud of pulling through at the eleventh hour, and others are proud for not having to stay awake for three or four days in order to meet their goal. Ultimately, there is no absolute arbiter to determine which accomplishment is better than another.

Where I'm concerned, process trumps ingenuity. A successful process that can provide a solution that is reliable, safe, cost-effective and on-time is far superior to a solution that prioritizes unorthodoxy and originality -- especially at the particular expense of reliability and safety. Students with a better understanding of process will be better equipped to handling projects of increased scale. Burning the candle at both ends to finish a project may be possible when you're surrounded by 30 students in a classroom, but it becomes less feasible when you're working beside 500 professionals at a company, each of whom have families and homes they must attend to.

Is process inspirational? Well, no. It's boring, actually. Process is built around meetings and approvals and budgeting and performance-review. It slows things down because it requires that we first explain and justify our intended course of action to others. Whether the others understand that action is almost inconsequential, as much of the value comes from simply slowing down and reexamining the decisions we make and their impact. I work fast alone; I work better in a group. Working with a group and explaining to them everything I do forces me to be more thoughtful and honest about my ideas. This benefits everyone and, where FIRST is concerned, usually results in robots that work. Is there anyone here who believes that fielding a robot that functions as designed and reliably so is not inspirational? It's certainly more enjoyable than spending six weeks on an ingenious gizmo that, come competition, doesn't work as advertised -- no matter how clever it looked on paper.
__________________
--Madison--

...down at the Ozdust!

Like a grand and miraculous spaceship, our planet has sailed through the universe of time. And for a brief moment, we have been among its many passengers.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 19-10-2005, 17:44
slickguy2007 slickguy2007 is offline
Copioli is the man!!!
FRC #1403 (Cougar Robotics)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: Skillman, NJ
Posts: 545
slickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond reputeslickguy2007 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to slickguy2007
Re: Should teams be pushed to make higher quality robots?

It is not always possible for teams to create a robot that is "visually pleasing", but isn't that really apart of the challenge? It is difficult enough to finish the robot on time and some teams (including my own) have made adjustments that make the robots less professional looking. You know what though, I am glad we made those changes because it allowed for us to get a great robot functioning and competing despite its less lack of beauty. FIRST, however, does recognize a team's ability to make the robot neat, organized and more "professional" by awarding the Motorola Quality Award.


As for teams not working hard enough, I graciously disagree with that. Especially now, when companies are not able to contribute as much as they use to, it is unfair to point fingers and claim that due to lack of funding or resources a team has not been working hard enough. The challenge was not meant to be easy, if it was meant to be easy it wouldn't be much fun.

I really don't like seeing fights on CD, so lets please lets not continue this.
In Sanddrag's defense, I don't think he meant anything disrespectful by his opinion nor do I believe that he wanted to start a fight. It is glorious year 9 for me in FIRST and I admit that I still have a lot to learn about myself, my team and GP. I <3 FIRST!

GO FIRST!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi