|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Should FIRST allow a wider variety of pneumatics? | |||
| Yes, GIVE ME MORE! |
|
23 | 88.46% |
| No |
|
3 | 11.54% |
| Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
I would be open to entertaining the idea of expanding available materials in almost any way except for actuators and batteries. Keeping all teams using the same number and type of actuators is an absolute must, in my opinion.
There are many motors and pneumatic cylinders that can be purchased that are far more capable than the ones we have in the kit, but then it becomes a question of which teams can afford the top of the line actuators. That said, I would not be opposed if some rotary pneumatics were added to the kit, or included in the choices for custom cylinders. _______________ If it's too loud, you're too old. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mad Dash for the Controls? | Madison | Rules/Strategy | 70 | 03-02-2003 22:50 |
| Sharp Wheels | archiver | 2001 | 17 | 23-06-2002 23:30 |
| QUESTION OF THE WEEK!!! | archiver | 2000 | 21 | 23-06-2002 23:25 |
| Zone Zeal Pool "Entry Fee" | Joe Johnson | Championship Event | 21 | 26-04-2002 02:56 |
| Passions and Choices | Mr.B | General Forum | 14 | 16-01-2002 11:11 |