|
|
|
 We want people to exercise Gracious Professionalism® and play at their best, but also not really because we find this archaic rule to satisfy something related to inspiring students to pursue careers in science and technology.™ - PayneTrain [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#29
01-12-2005, 21:35
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Best Teams
Argh... I wish I had gone to nationals so I could see all of these amazing robots.
My list (from teams I've seen) 67 - Yeah... everyone knows why... we were almost on their alliance at Buckeye had we not been picked later on in the first run through 249 - Dubbed "Back Pack bot" by our team for obvious reasons. They carried around multiple tetras and, with two arms, grabbed them from the bottoms, flipped them overhead onto the goal. Splendid. Almost on their alliance at Buckeye. 229 - Fast and smooth, lost two regionals because of alliance partners... 135 - Incredibly fast. They never dropped tetras, they capped rediculously fast. We were in a match with them and 229 in Buckeye. We owned the other team so hard. However. In the finals 229 lost to 67 and 249 because 135 rammed high and knocked an opponent over. My standards are high and remember, these are of the bots I have witnessed this year. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| **FIRST EMAIL**/2005 FRC Game Design Communication to FRC Teams | Goobergunch | FIRST E-Mail Blast Archive | 1 | 06-01-2005 09:29 |
| The top 8 teams will be....(2004) | Jessica Boucher | General Forum | 20 | 24-03-2004 22:31 |
| More teams in the elimination rounds | DougHogg | General Forum | 16 | 27-04-2003 16:11 |
| Long post - this year's game was tough - here's why: | archiver | 2001 | 7 | 24-06-2002 03:31 |
Threaded Mode