|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: New calculation of Reputation
This has come up several times before, and the general argument is that we shouldn't change reputation because it doesn't really matter.
See: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=38971 http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=29490 But here is my question: What is the intent of the reputation system? If it is intended to let people know who on this forum is experienced and knows what they are talking about, we definately don't want artificial bonuses for new posters. Should someone with 3 rep and one post really be higher than someone with 1500 rep and 750 posts? If anything, they should be listed by posts times rep. Last edited by ahecht : 06-12-2005 at 03:42. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Appropriate use of reputation points | mtrawls | CD Forum Support | 62 | 11-02-2008 14:37 |
| Reputation Deflation | Joe Matt | CD Forum Support | 26 | 22-07-2005 00:36 |
| suggestion to reduce existing reputation for upcoming season | Joe Ross | CD Forum Support | 44 | 03-01-2005 01:24 |
| Reputation and private messages | RyanMcE | Chit-Chat | 8 | 22-04-2004 07:40 |
| Reputation systems scares you away from post | Ryan Albright | Chit-Chat | 26 | 21-02-2004 16:45 |