|
|
|
 That statement makes far too much sense for me to understand it. - Aignam [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| That statement makes far too much sense for me to understand it. - Aignam [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
10-12-2005, 09:39
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Pittsburgh and Cleveland Regionals
it seems like things should balance out in the big picture.
If 150 teams in the Cleveland, pittsburgh and rochester NH 'area' are all planning on attending 2 regionals, and this year they cannot goto their 2nd regional at one of these three cities, then they will have to go somewhere else which means these teams will be registering at other regionals this year (other cities) - so those other cities events will be filling up faster, prompting teams to travel further to attend Cleveland, Pittsburgh and Rochester as their 2nd regional. If 500 or 600 teams are funded to attend 2 regionals this year, they have to go somewhere, right? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PITTSBURGH REGIONAL | omutton | Regional Competitions | 49 | 18-03-2005 09:34 |
| pittsburgh regioanl | Alex Cormier | Regional Competitions | 21 | 15-03-2004 11:05 |
| Pittsburgh Regional Social Activities | MasterZeus | Regional Competitions | 5 | 28-02-2004 22:01 |
| Pittsburgh, wrap up and frustrations | D.J. Fluck | Regional Competitions | 29 | 19-03-2003 19:13 |
| Pittsburgh and Lessons Learned | Paul Copioli | Regional Competitions | 1 | 17-03-2003 11:26 |
Threaded Mode