|
#331
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 Official Game Hint Discussion
Quote:
|
|
#333
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2006 Official Game Hint Discussion
The Shovel Show was an art exhibit at the Highwire Gallery. Maybe some sort of highwire traversing going on either by bots or game pieces?
|
|
#334
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 Official Game Hint Discussion
Quote:
idea #2 maybe 5 bots tangling with pasta means a flag football or tag type game, which would explain the possible Joe Montana reference. |
|
#335
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 Official Game Hint Discussion
Quote:
|
|
#336
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 Official Game Hint Discussion
![]() Looking at the "Big Boss" size pool toys, I'm having second thoughts about discounting the pool toys as possible game objects. That big foam tube wouldn't be that easy to break, and with the price(about two bucks apiece, so for FIRST, maybe like $1. I'd imagine they get at least bulk discounts.) You could afford to chuck one or two every match.Thats like 250 bucks, in a worst case scenario, per regional. Not too bad, considering how many tetras kicked the bucket during play. And they were much more expensive per piece. Now, the problem comes in two parts: 1. Thats alot of stuff to fit into Mike Wade's trailer. It's big...But so are like 500 pool noodles! 2. What happens when the toys get chipped up? The things can probably get beat around awhile before they are completely destroyed, but in the meantime, they'd get chipped up and become less handleable. A tetra was eother broken, or not. Simple as that. A ball was either useable, or not. A bin was either broken, or not. Pool toys are a bit more destructible. So, I still have my money on footballs, but there might be new light shed on the pool toys. |
|
#337
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 Official Game Hint Discussion
Quote:
![]() |
|
#338
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 Official Game Hint Discussion
Quote:
I read through FIRSTwiki but there is very little information about those robots. They don't appear to be designed to affect gameplay much...did they? If so how were the bots kept neutral...I am sure at some point it sat in a spot where somebody would have liked to be. How were they maintained? In short does anybody have any further information on previous house robots? Last edited by Katy : 27-12-2005 at 22:08. |
|
#339
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 Official Game Hint Discussion
Quote:
I don't know if anyone else noticed it, but in the Montana state flag, there are three plateaus, with the highest at the left, and the lowest at the water. Does this mean anything about the game? Will we see the return of stairs? ![]() Also, despite pool noodles being cheap, they will probably never be used. If you thought seeing PVC tetras fall apart was bad, the utter cataclysmic anhiliation of pool noodles would totally dwarf it. Although it may not seem like it, to build a full-size tetra for the 2005 game cost anywhere from $10-15 each. While redeeming gift cards at D.ick's Sporting Goods today, I noted the cost of the generic footballs at $11.99. So the price of a football would not be that bad. Footballs would also be almost indestructible. It would be very hard to try to pop one, although not impossible. Another thing that we need to consider when thinking about playing field objects is the "cool" factor. The GDC would not pick something that an audience would not deem to be "cool". Footballs would definitely satisfy. So would balls, including soccer balls, kickballs, and large balls, etc. Tetras could be considered cool looking. Also, I like the "green" as refering to money (aka points). This can mean that something high[er] could be worth more points? Is this like the 2005 game, where the highest tetra owns the stack? Or does this mean that something up higher than the rest of the field will be worth more points (like a high goal, or a hanging bar)? If only all this food for thought happening in this thread could somehow be funneled into solving world hunger... ![]() |
|
#340
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2006 Official Game Hint Discussion
I just understood the banana reference.
The shovel show was at the highwire gallery. There will be a wire stretching across the field. There will be some sort of object (football or pool noodle) hanging from the wire, which the robots will have to pick. Terry in Terry Hall is similar to Tammy in Tammy Tremble (which is where the baton reference has come from), the song by terry hall mentions bananas and the line "freshly picked for me," this was pointed out above by nycpunk. This reinforces the idea that scoring objects will be hanging from a wire strung across the field. Now, Lavery's frame from the animation...there's obviously water. In my opinion there are two possible interpretations of this: 1) there will be a trough filled with water under the wire that the scoring objects are hung from, or 2) there will be some sort of object to make getting directly under the wire impossible (or just really hard). This object may be green and could be a raised platform with no sides and a slippery surface. My guess is that each side of the field only has one access ramp at the edge of the field which is colored green for the camera during autonomous. Now where to go from here...I'd hate to press my luck in sucessfully predicting the game. There will be a goal above the wire which will be the maximum scoring goal, however goals will only count if the objects hanging from the wire are used to score - and yes, half the objects will be colored for each alliance. There will be a goal for each alliance on the opposite alliance's side that accepts footballs. The alliances will start out with the maximum number of footballs, just like they did with tetras, and the robots will be loaded by human players or by autoloaders, just like last year. I think i'm starting to stretch it, but I still think that there will be scoring objects hung from a wire stretching across the width of the field. edit: There is a strong possibility that there will be 1 green scoring object directly under the high goal which can only be scored during autonomous. Last edited by buss : 27-12-2005 at 22:49. |
|
#341
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 Official Game Hint Discussion
remember Lavery titled this as the 2007 hint, there is no way that they can implement water for this years game (look at multiple prior posts and threads). How do we even know if this picture even relates to this years game. Right now the only thing that I am confident about is the game piece being footballs. There is still a lot to find out about this game, don't look too much into Lavery's 2007 picture.
|
|
#342
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 Official Game Hint Discussion
Quote:
|
|
#343
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2006 Official Game Hint Discussion
Quote:
Quote:
For the record, I still have my circular hill with possible field goal. But one thing I find interesting is that we don't know how much of the game this may or may not be telling us. For all we know, this clue is just about the game piece and number of robots. Or it tells us the entire game. Or, they're just messing with our heads and the "clue" has absolutely nothing to do with the game... I guess time will tell. |
|
#344
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2006 Official Game Hint Discussion
I woud agree that we shouldn't look too much into the 2007 "hint", I belive that dave's picture is just trying to fool and confuze us (even more
) before kickoff, thereby creating the havoc and chaos he loves to see these few weeks we have left On the pool noodles -- I like the idea of them being implemented in the game, it could be possible that FIRST could do something to make them more sturdy, they could possibly wrap them in duct tape. They would be practically indestructable |
|
#345
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2006 Official Game Hint Discussion
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2002 game prediction contest!!! | Ken Leung | Rumor Mill | 41 | 31-12-2007 18:18 |
| 2006 game poll #1 (field size) | dhitchco | Rumor Mill | 18 | 30-12-2005 23:31 |
| 2006 game poll #2 | dhitchco | Rumor Mill | 1 | 23-12-2005 22:57 |
| [Official 2006 Game Design] Autonomy And Other Technology Discussions | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 36 | 12-11-2005 17:49 |
| Ok, so YOU design the 2003 game... | dlavery | General Forum | 157 | 07-01-2003 23:55 |